Sunday, January 12, 2020

TIME Magazine promotes pit bulls

The "Why I Hate Dogs" Series


Current issue of Time Magazine, week of July 22, 2013, has a three-page article, “The Softer Side of Pit Bulls”. 

Even before reading it I knew it would mention “Petey” from the Little Rascals TV show.

Pit Bull fanatics love to trot out Petey as their pit bull ambassador; they do it all the time.

The article is a classic case of having cake and wanting to eat it too. These pit nuts want the dogs to be seen as a distinct breed, a family friendly breed, then in the same breath imply it’s unfair to stereotype a breed.


Gee, only if the stereotype is negative, huh. The next time a pit bull mauls someone to death (give it about a week), Time magazine will have blood on its hands for promoting the most dangerous breed today as family friendly. Send a letter to the editor, letters@time.com, to point out pit bulls deserve their bad image.

By paul on 14 July 2013

(This post was extracted from the site WhyIHateDogs.com, that does not exist anymore, with the sole aim to keep it alive for all the normal people out there as the great info on that site is always relevant and timeless. Any concern, just drop a line.)

Leave Your Own Comments at the End of Comments 

170 comments

  1. KaD
    If you actually WATCH the Little Rascals look closely at what Petey does on the show-chase and bite people. This aside from the fact it’s a TELEVISION SHOW with child ACTORS and an animal ACTOR and bears no more semblance to reality than a soap opera. By the way, the dog that played Petey was poisoned to death on the set-why do you think THAT was?
      ↓
    1. snakelady
      They compare this dog, used in an era of no seatbelts, inadequate or even dangerous medicine, and various other dangers to children that no longer exist, to the pit bull of today that has been inbred and overbred AND misrepresented as a loving family “nanny” based on a bunch of vintage photos with no provenance whatsoever. It scares me how many innocent children have died because of this “logic” and how many more will die in the future.
      I suppose, since they’re using examples of a dog from a show that began nearly 100 years ago, that they also believe you can pull a tooth by tying one end of a string to the tooth, one to a doorknob, and slamming the door. If it was done on television, it must be true.

    2. Sharon
      What a load.
      Petey died of NATURAL causes. That’s history.
      Love the way you haters make up stuff.

      1. lee77
        @Sharon: The first Petey most certainly was poisoned — probably because he bit the wrong person! After the “Lil’ Rascals” ended, Carl Switzer, who played the role of “Alfalfa,” admitted Petey bit him on one occasion, was nasty-tempered and the kids dreaded working with him. Thomas Ross Bond, who played “Butch,” agreed and said everyone on the set hated the dog.

  2. Ginger
    I actually know the dog that is in the picture of the Time magazine article. She’s one of the sweetest dogs ever.

  3. AnnLA
    I own three shelter/rescue dogs; a Pitbull, a German Shepherd (my foster failure;) and a Husky. By today’s standards all three would be banned somewhere, which would be unfortunate because they are all amazing and live together in harmony. They are of different ages and different backgrounds. My Husky we had raised from 12 days old, she is now 5 yrs. My Pittie girl we got at 6 months old after a long wait here in LA. Her former owner had been charged with animal abuse. She a scared little pup that had to stay in the shelter for 3 months until the trial ended. She is now 4 yrs. old. My 11 yr old GSD was from that same LA shelter, she was already old at the time 8-9 yrs. and I couldn’t get a GSD rescue to get her bc of her age so I stepped in to foster her. I do this a lot. Anyway, after providing medical care (she needed an operation), recovery and love. “She” decided to stay with us. It is never the breed of dog, it is the owner. Much like raising a child. (I have two in college) I live in an upscale beach community of doctors, lawyers, CEO, actors and other entertainers. The dog of choice is the Pittie and ANY rescue dog or cat in general. These owners take these pets into their home and provide medical care, training and a place to truly call home. They educate themselves on the breed and NOT the propaganda against the breed. Some pits I am sure can be dangerous with the wrong but intentional breeding, it’s been happening for decades. The entire breed suffers for this, all the wonderful qualities bred out and discouraged. Those are the unlucky pups of ppl who use them as fight dogs or if they are not aggressive, sadly bait dogs. Those dogs can be retrained or live out its life in peace at a sanctuary…and those would be the very, very lucky ones. We know what happens to the ones not adopted, fostered or rescued. =(

    1. Izzy
      “Much like raising a child. ”
      This is the whole problem with this country. It’s either an obsession with fetuses or dogs. Listen to you “my 4-year-old” “she needed an operation” blah blah. Meanwhile, actual children and elderly (usually) who end up mauled by these wonderful, sweet, loving beasts are just forgotten collateral damage.
      Your kids are grown – why don’t you work to save the wild animals in your area? Many of the charismatic species (lions, rhinos, chimps) are threatened with extinction. Yet otherwise intelligent people with grown kids and resources to share pour them into this overbred species that is taking over the country. What a waste!
      I long ago gave up trying to make sense of the modern American dog owner. I was in another country for a month recently where dogs were not a national obsession and it was amazing. Even I, after having been attacked twice by asshole dogs with asshole owners, had not realized how crazy this country is until I got back.
      Is there any hope?

      1. willko
        I know what you mean. These ignorant bubble-heads can’t do anything but recite inane dog trivia as if it’s the Unified Theory. LA Annie is symptomatic of the large-scale social and emotional aberration of dog-worship – a waste of human intellect and reasoning.

    2. Izzy
      “The dog of choice is the Pittie and ANY rescue dog or cat in general. These owners take these pets into their home and provide medical care, training and a place to truly call home.”
      And I bet they all eat factory farmed meat without a shred of guilt. Not to mention the wasted resources going to these creatures.

    3. Bea
      I am sure astronaut Mark Kelly lived in an upscale laguna beach community when his daughter’s pit bull attacked and killed a baby seal. As if being wealthy, or educated in some specialized area makes a person better at decision making. What a hoot! I can just tell what dunces and publicity grabbers they are by choosing a pitbull. “Hey, look at me, I am special.” Wake up if you are so educated and look at the statistics regarding dogs, especially pitbulls. Why anyone would want one of those filthy, ugly mutts is beyond me.

    4. fojap
      Pit bulls are very popular here in Baltimore as well, though not so much among the doctors and CEOs. In my community, they’re popular among people who want to look tough, people who are tough and people who like dog fighting. Has it occurred to you to work on the other end, the source of all these unwanted dogs?

  4. willko
    Time Magazine is corporate media (Time-Warner). In fact, they are in the pet business and are currently invested in pet location systems. These people care nothing for the animals themselves only more “pet consumers”.
    On another note, my son has a friend with one of the “sweetest pits in the world”. She seems to like people but has attacked and maimed several other dogs resulting in the owner paying out thousands in vet bills. Still, he posts her picture on FB and all the other fanatical bullshit pit owners like to recite.
    Looks like we have some cleanup to do……..

  5. Patty
    Bea, Izzy, and Willko, I couldn’t agree with you more in response to Ann in LA’s post. And it is incredible how people with pit-boners go on about how gentle and affectionate their dogs are. They refuse to admit that every single dog, without exception, is unpredictable under the right circumstances.
    And, jesus god, I agree with you, Izzy. If you threw a pitbull into a river, you could skim ugly for months.

    1. lee77
      Exactly. The only way pit nutters and dog freaks, in general, ever learn is the hard way — provided they’re still alive! A case on point is that of 63-year-old Sandra Lambert, who was recently attacked by two pit bulls she didn’t have any better sense than to rescue and feed. One of the monsters had already bitten her, family members warned her about them and she still maintained it was “all in how you treat them.” Now that she’s lost an arm, she’s asking that both dogs be put down. A second case on point is that of 63-year- old (what is about older women and dogs?!) Linda Oliver in Texas, who didn’t have any better sense than to adopt a large, stray Rottweiler mix that mauled her to death July 1. Then there’s 54-year-old Linda Henry in Louisiana who had no better sense than to live in a houseful of pit bulls and now she’s missing both arms, an eye and an ear! Last year, two dog freaks, Rebecca Carey in Georgia and Mary Jo Hunt in North Carolina, both of whom had no better sense than to take in multiple dogs, including pit bulls, and both of whom were ripped to shreds and died for their efforts! But at least in these cases, the land-sharks and other dangerous fleabags attacked their delusional owners instead of some innocent child or person walking along the sidewalk.

  6. Nibbles T.Rat
    I wouldn’t be surprised if all the pit-nutters starting screaming “OMG ITS THE NOT THE DOGS FAULT!1111111 PITBULLS R MISUNDERSTOOD!!!1111 ” when a pitbull suddenly kills somebody or somebody’s pet, because of idiot’s promoting pitbulls as “sweet and innocent family friendly dogs” and then somebody, completely unware of the danger, goes and get’s tricked and then goes gets and pitbull.
    Pitbulls deserve their bad reputation. When will people ever realize that? -_-

    1. lee77
      You’re absolutely right. Additionally, there is no way to “rehabilitate” or behaviorally assess a pit bull. Last year within a matter of 4 to 5 weeks, newly-adopted pit bulls that had been evaluated and pronounced “safe” for adoption, attacked humans in Arkansas, Georgia, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Tennessee and five of those humans were children! Last December, an adopted pit bull that had been evaluated and pronounced “safe” for adoption killed a 2-year-old girl in Topeka, Kansas. Yet, the pit nutters and dog freaks are disseminating information that these monsters are safe in homes where there are children. Several humane societies and other dog rescue organizations have been, and are being, sued because dogs pronounced “safe” for adoption attacked someone, usually a child, within days, or weeks after adoption. Unfortunately, the unbalanced people who work in dog rescue will do and say anything to save the life of some worthless fleabag and care absolutely nothing for the human beings (including children) they place in danger as a consequence.

    2. Pit lover
      Pit bulls are not the problem, people are the problem. I have always owned pit bulls and also have kids, they are very smart and very good with children. They protect their owners like any other dog would. These idiots that feed them gun powder and cross breed them are why pit bulls have a bad name. I would be in a bad mood if i was fed gun powder and it was tearing up my insides. Get the facts before you react.

      1. Death To Pitbulls
        You are delusional! Pit bulls attack because they were BRED to attack and inflict the maximum damage possible. It has NOTHING to do with the way they are “treated.” Most pit bulls that attack are family pets that were raised from puppies and have never been mistreated or “trained” to fight! In fact, many children that are attacked by pit bulls, were attacked by the damn family pet! Get YOUR facts straight before responding with pit nutter BS.

        1. TF
          YOU are the delusional and ignorant one, who is spewing nonsense about the history of the APBT and similar breeds. Now before I tell you the history, let me explain that I am NOT a “pit nutter” although I do love the breed and similar breeds like Am. Staffs/Am. Bully’s/etc. I do agree that some owners and rescues act like they are perfect dogs. They aren’t perfect for ALL families, but they can make wonderful family dog’s in the right home.
          Now i’ll explain the actual history, you dimwit.
          YES, pit bulls were bred to fight other dogs. Big whoop-de-doo, am I right? However, they have always been specifically bred for people friendliness. How do you think the dog fighters could tend to their dogs wounds if they were vicious towards people?! How the hell do you think they would be able to pull them out of the ring if they were aggressive towards people?! Infact, dog fighters back in the day wanted a dog that was friendly with their family/children, and ANY pit bull that showed human aggression was immediately killed. Because of their fighting history, they are MORE LIKELY to be friendly than other breeds. Just because pits may be prone to dog aggression does NOT mean they will turn and attack a child. I’ve been an animal shelter volunteer for 6 years and we’ve had nasty German Shepherds, Rottweilers, Labs, even Chihuahuas and other small breeds, but NEVER was I afraid of any pit bull that came through our shelter doors. Never have I been given a reason to be afraid. I’ve seen pits brought in that were starved to death, abused, ngelected, owned by drug dealers, etc. and all of them have still been sweet and loyal dogs who TO THIS DAY have never attacked or mauled someone.
          Also, I hope you know that the media ALWAYS labels 90% of dog attacks as “pit bulls” but their is NEVER PROOF that it was actually a pit bull. What about the other stories of dogs attacking and killing people that weren’t pit bulls, you seem to not want to mention those for some reason? I know of a baby that was killed by a jack russell, a child that had their earn torn off by a labrador, and ive heard MULTIPLE other stories of goldens, labs, cocker spaniels, etc. attacking. That is because ANY breed can attack. The media likes to cause a stir and start propaganda, so they label any attack as “pit bull”.
          Anyway, you people are crazy. When I am finally able to go out and adopt a pit from my local shelter I can not wait to walk him all around you idiot people and show off what a great dog I have. (;

          1. Death To Pitbulls
            YES, you ARE a pit nutter. All your comment was was pit nutter BS.
            For starters, After pit bulls, Rottweilers kill and seriously injure more people than any other breed/type of dog. Sure, other breeds of dogs can attack, but NO breed has killed more than pit bulls, and Of the 37 people in the US attacked and killed by dogs so far this year , 24 were killed by pit bulls. Pit bulls serve no useful purpose and they should all be rounded up and shot!
            And For your information, You people who think all dogs or all the same,pit bulls are MORE LIKELY to be friendly than other breeds or that you have to “train” a pit bull to be “mean,” are so full of s**t that if your eyes aren’t brown already, they soon will be. Different breeds/types of dogs were created for specific purposes and each has a set of genetic characteristics associated with that particular breed/type. Pit bulls have already killed over 24-25 people in the US this year and I’m sure there will be more before the year ends.
          2. anon
            Like I said before, You know the difference between a dachshund and a pit bull? If a dachshund bites you, you can either punt it or run. If a pit bull bites you, you might die. This is not just about people not training their pit bull. The bigger problem is the amount of people in mass DENIAL or NAIVETY about what pit bulls were created for and what they can–and have–done. They were created as the ultimate fighting machine. The reason they’re “good with people” is because in animal fights, the handler had to be able to come in at any time to pull the dog out of the pit without being bitten. And for Jesus sake, some breeds are, by standard, poorly behaved around most people and animals, and not fit to be in a domestic society. Fila Brasilieros are so mistrustful that in dog shows, judges aren’t supposed to touch them. Their relatives, the likely extinct Cuban/Siberian/Russian bloodhounds, pursued escaped slaves and tore them to shreds. Pit bulls were genetically hardwired to go after their game until it was dead. Why is it only pit bull fanciers have the magical ability to tell what a pit bull is? Not everyone mistakes a Lab, Rottweiler, or Great Dane as a pit bull!
          3. The first anon
            If you had a better sense of civility you would keep your “future great dog” away from people who didn’t want to interact with him. As for the desired lack of aggression toward people back in the day. What about people playing with their own pets outside which get attacked by pit bulls, and then the person gets hurt when they intervene and the pit redirects their aggression? Okay, fine, “dogfightin’ era” pits were carefully and specifically bred to not be aggressive toward people. Because pit bulls were specifically MADE ONLY for bloodsport. If pits were completely incapable of distinguishing between people and other animals, collective society might have had the sense by now to realize the breed should have never come into existence. Canine behaviorists with years of experience say you can’t love or train out certain traits in each breed of dog. I don’t find the claim of benevolence toward humans particularly promising, since for so long now pit bulls have gruesomely attacked so many people. Pro-pit propagandists need to screw this “any breed can attack” rebuttal because even though it’s true that other dogs have harmed and killed, and other dogs will harm and kill in the future, pit bulls do so disproportionately. They are also likely to deal great more damage because of their history. There is no good reason for us to keep an animal that originated just for killing. Yet we’ve turned it into a family pet, a misunderstood victimized little cutesy wutsie. There are literally hundreds of breeds in existence today. If a person decides they MUST have a dog, they can get a different one.
            Also, I don’t know who copy-pasted as me in the September 21 post. Wasn’t me but I guess I shouldn’t be miffed. It’s rather easy for an anon to get a doppelgänger.
      2. dogsfromhell
        Pit bulls are definitely the problem and people who are delusional enough to believe the myths are enablers.

  7. Krys
    Most people do could not even recognize a pitbull If it bite them in the face. If a large dog with muscles bites someone or other animal automatically its called a pitbull. I bet If yall tipo a quiz on different breeds yall would fail. The problem with people owning these powerful diga is they dont realize the training that these dogs need.I have worked in many government animal control shelter. And most people attacked or witnesses of the attacks call the dog a pitbull. And it turned out to be a lab, rot, mastiff, or heck even a great dane. So i have had multiple officers mistake other breeds as pits so Until every dog bite can be properly identified i dont think any breed is vicious. I have penes multiple breeds n my meanest was the dachsund. So most people that say how vicious this animal is doesnt actually read facts it opinions. every decade its another vicious breed. The real problem is giving some one unqualified an animal WHO doesnt love it or train it properly. Write someone about that.

    1. Izzy
      Blah blah blah, sorry this has been debunked time after time. Give it up already.
      Did you know lions, chimpanzees, gorillas and rhinos, not to mention many whale and dolphin species are on the verge of extinction? Why are you obsessed with protecting an over populated pest species that is ugly, needy and smelly, dangerous but can’t live without humans- pathetic.

    2. lee77
      Instead of working in “many government animal control shelter” [sic], you should be somewhere taking a course in English grammar and composition. I realize everyone makes typos, etc. when typing on the internet, but your post is so full of grammatical errors it is laughable. Just because YOU don’t know a pit bull when you see one doesn’t mean we all have that problem!

    3. fojap
      I absolutely agree with you about dachshunds. They were bred to hunt badger and are known to be very tenacious when attacking. If they were bigger, they would probably be quite dangerous. I have a dear friend who dislikes dogs on account of being attacked by his grandmother’s dachshund as a toddler. It’s definitely not responsible to have a small child around one unsupervised.
      Personally, I’d be quite comfortable with the idea that all dogs over about twenty pounds be leashed and muzzled. Unlike the owner of this blog, I don’t hate dogs, but I’ve seen way to many dog owners who apparently have little regard for other humans. Trust me, I’d be very happy to see owners whose dogs bite punished appropriately regardless of the breed.
      My daily jog is routed to avoid overly territorial dogs whose owners don’t have adequate fencing, and that includes a terrifying standard poodle, a breed of dog I normally like, and no pit bulls, as it happens. So why don’t we work together to have stricter laws for all dog owners.

  8. willko
    Krys -Eighteen people have been mauled to death this year, so far. Of those 18 deaths, 14 were by Pit Bulls. ‘Nuff facts for ya, hillbilly.
    I’d say that’s enough data to make your claim just more pit obsession bullshit…
    The breed needs to be wiped off the face of the planet. But inbred half-wits like you don’t have any other way of getting attention. I’ll juz git me a pit bull and I’ll be special…
    “yall” don’t come back now, ya heah…..

    1. lee77
      By my calculation, 19 people in the US have been murdered by dogs so far this year, 16 of them by pit bulls. Here’s my list:
      Betty Todd, age 65 (South Carolina), Christian Gormanous, 4 (Texas), Elsie Grace, 91 (California), Isaiah Aguilar, 2 (Texas), James Harding, 62 (Maryland), Ryan Maxwell, 7 (Illinois), Dax Borchardt, 14 months, (Illinois), Monica Laminack, 21 months (Georgia), Tyler Jett, 7 (Florida), Claudia Gallardo, 38 (California), Jordyn Ardnt, 4 (Iowa), Beau Rutledge, 2 (Georgia), Pamela Maria Devitt, 63 (California), Carlton Freeman, 80 (South Carolina) Nephi Selu, 6 (California), Arianna Jolee Nerrbach, 5 (South Carolina) — all murdered by pit bulls.
      A 17th person, Rachel Honabarger, 35 (Ohio) was killed May 2 by her own German shepherd, an 18th, Ayden Evans, 5, (Arkansas) was murdered by a 150-pound bullmastiff, and a 19th, a 63-year-old woman in Liberty County (Texas), was killed by a Rottweiler-mix she had adopted two weeks earlier.

  9. anon
    http://fox2now.com/2013/02/06/poll-can-you-spot-the-pitbull/ http://www.understand-a-bull.com/Findthebull/findpitbull_v3.html http://www.pickthepit.com/ http://www.smilingdogrescue.com/find_the_pitbull.html
    I got it right the first time for the first three, second time for the last.
    You know the difference between a dachshund and a pit bull? If a dachshund bites you, you can either punt it or run. If a pit bull bites you, you might die. This is not just about people not training their pit bull. The bigger problem is the amount of people in mass DENIAL or NAIVETY about what pit bulls were created for and what they can–and have–done. They were created as the ultimate fighting machine. The reason they’re “good with people” is because in animal fights, the handler had to be able to come in at any time to pull the dog out of the pit without being bitten. And for Jesus sake, some breeds are, by standard, poorly behaved around most people and animals, and not fit to be in a domestic society. Fila Brasilieros are so mistrustful that in dog shows, judges aren’t supposed to touch them. Their relatives, the likely extinct Cuban/Siberian/Russian bloodhounds, pursued escaped slaves and tore them to shreds. Pit bulls were genetically hardwired to go after their game until it was dead. Why is it only pit bull fanciers have the magical ability to tell what a pit bull is? Not everyone mistakes a Lab, Rottweiler, or Great Dane as a pit bull!

  10. Sharon
    Lots of ignorance on this page.
    People who hate dogs (and animals) are pretty much sub-human filth: you have no souls and it’s evident from what you’ve written. Your hearts must be the size of peas.
    Since dogs are such great judges of character, it’s no wonder they probably hate all of you.

    1. Izzy
      Dog owners do not care about other animals. They feed their bizarro substitute children food from cruel factory farms and contribute hugely and unnecessarily to global warming and other environmental problems. Their unleashed dogs are destructive to wildlife and they don’t care. you are the sociopaths, not us.

    2. anon
      Animal hater? I’m nowhere close. I don’t even hate dogs. What I ‘hate’ is the cultural obsession with dogs that allows very little criticism.
      I don’t see how acknowledging a breed’s origins constitutes a lack of a soul.

    3. willko
      Sharon :I thought dogs weren’t judgmental and loved “unconditionally”. Which is it, you stupid bitch..?
      You people are so deluded you can’t think straight.

    4. lee77
      Dogs are unnatural creatures that chase down and kill livestock and wildlife purely for sport. Wolves and most other animals in the wild kill only for food or out of fear. Additionally, dog excrement kills grass and everything else it touches, then washes into bodies of water where it kills marine life. In some large municipalities, as much as 35% of the pollution in streams, lakes and ponds is from dog excrement. Anyone who loves the environment, wildlife, or animals in general, hates dogs!

      1. Pinkamena Diane Pie
        Dogs are NOT the only animal that kill for fun, you idiot! Household cats are known for surplus killing (as are their wild counterparts), and have been linked to the devastation of native fauna populations on islands, because they literally kill for fun, and will kill so much that they don’t bother to eat it. Cats are also known for maiming their prey, and leaving them to suffer and die on their own. Same with Komodo dragons– they bite the prey, and let them die of sepsis before they even bother to eat them, if they can track them down again, of course. Foxes and large cats will also surplus kill, and will stash their food away for future consumption.
        Speaking about cats, Cats are much more destructive to wildlife then dogs,Humans are the most destructive to the environment,we are the ones that wiped out entire species and landscapes.
        In fact, Cats are the ones that are a danger to wild species,which are more vital then chickens. Just like I said before, Cats kill for fun as well. My sisters cat killed a baby rabbit and left it to a slow death,My Mother at that time had to end its life. I had a cat that killed many rodents and birds and only ate about 35% of her kills.
        As for feces killing grass, You are completely wrong. for instance, it isn’t the feces that kill grass, but the animal’s urine. The composition of dog feces is no more harmful to the environment as that of pigs or other omnivores– if pig manure can be used as fertilizer, I am pretty sure dog feces are a go as well (though, probably a fair bit more unpalatable smell wise). Dogs are also not the only species that defecates in water and feeds algal growth– cows, hippos, reptiles, fish, whales, etc. all defecate in or near water sources (does that mean that fish and whales are by some stretch, suicidal?)
        Bird feces are by far the most detrimental to the environment, because of their acidity from being mixed with urine. Dog feces won’t eat away at car paint, but raven feces will.
        You are nothing but a delusional troll. I have no idea what happened to you to make you despise dogs, but just cause you despise them does not mean you should spew your hate around the internet for everyone to see, nor should you spew forth your crude lies either. Get your facts straight, and maybe come back when you’ve grown up and learned some common courtesy and proper manners.

        1. dogsfromhell
          Dear Diane Dullard:
          Re: Your assertion that we need to “get our facts straight”.
          You will need to review my post regarding dog feces. These FACTS are reported by the U.S. Center for Disease Control which you may research yourself. Simply scroll to the bottom of the post to find the source and others if you can read that far. So yes, dog shit does in fact pollute our drinking water while the other animals you cite live in their natural habitats and thus support their own complex ecosystems. This concept will likely require some reading on your part as well. Perhaps if dogs aka wolves had been left to their own natural habitat in the wild we would not have the canine crisis we have today. Per your other “facts” , the next time my trailer trash neighbor lets his two shit machines out to use his backyard toilet, I will certainly advise him that the reason he has a polka dotted lawn is due to dog URINE not the dog shit he goes out to mow once a week. Perhaps he can chase them around the yard with a urinal to fix this dilemma. Now as for cats, they may kill other animals but as far as I know they are not known for maiming and murdering children. And are we to understand you are complaining about cats providing rodent control??

          1. Pinkamena Diane Pie
            It’s funny, because the same page has a link to a page on the same website that is about the benefits of pets (Dogs included)
            http://www.cdc.gov/HEALTHYPETS/health_benefits.htm
            And did you even read the rest of my comment, or could you not be bothered as reading a simple comment would be too much for you? Let me cry my eyes out for you. Boo hoo hoo.
            Some parents also kill and abuse their children, so does it mean parents should be banned?
            In fact, MANY things we use are dangerous and can kill.
            And as for dogs killing children, why were they attacked? Because their parents couldn’t even bother to watch them and shouldn’t of even been parents in the first place!
            And I literally don’t give a damn about your neighbor. It’s YOUR problem, not mine. Nobody cares, and your damn neighbor has NOTHING to do with what I am talking about. Keep on topic, or don’t bother posting!
            So your reply was a complete WASTE of my time and was just whining about YOUR problems. Next time, please don’t waste my time.
          2. dogsfromhell
            Dullard
            I suspect you are a high school student. This is a site where people who do not want dogs forced on them come to support each other. We try to educate the “un-invited” such as yourself. It is usually a waste of breathe. Your long-winded posts reciting dog mantra are not new to us. You need to read comments from myself and others as we all get very bored repeating these concepts to dog worshippers like you. However I will point out one huge fallacy in your delusional reasoning. If a child is ever attacked or killed by a dog, it is not the victim’s fault nor the victim’s parents fault. The dog and its owners are 100% responsible. If a dog is has not been properly socialized and it attacks or kills, it has no place as a domestic pet or in a residential area. There are never any excuses. Victims are not to blame. Wild animals attack perceived threats not domestic pets. NO EXCUSES. If this is your thought processes then you are an abusive/neglectful parent waiting to happen. Lastly, you are an obvious attention seeker. You should not be given any further attention.
          3. Pinkamena Diane Pie
            To dogsfromhell:
            If I am an attention seeker, then why do you reply to my comments that would be giving me “attention”?
            I NEVER said it was the victims fault. I was talking about if the attacker dog was the family’s PET, not somebody elses dog! Obviously you didn’t read properly.
            Thank you for wasting my time again.
    5. snakelady
      Oh boy, here we go again.
      Out of respect for my fellow posters, I will refrain from using the colorful language this deserves. If I have to see one more dog kisser saying I don’t have a soul because I don’t like DOGS I will lose my freaking mind.
      I like animals. I love cats, and I have one. I love snakes, and I have close to 100 (breeder NOT hoarder). I like birds, so I have feeders set up all over my property. I adore penguins. I admire and respect the beauty of all wild animals. I will slam on my brakes to avoid hitting any animal in the road. So how am I soulless….because I don’t like your pet of choice? Because if your pit bull wandered onto my property, I would have the right to defend myself and my family against it. A 30.06 would work nicely.
      I live with two dogs. Two obnoxious mutts I put up with for my family’s sake. I have despised dogs all my life. Having them in my house just sealed it. So what is your smartass response to that, dog lover (Sharon)? I have dogs, I help take care of them, and don’t abuse them….but once they’re gone there will be no more.
      Soulless? Animal hater? Not even close.

      1. Pinkamena Diane Pie
        Why do you even have dogs if you hate them so much? Why do you even take care of them if you hate them so much?

        1. anon
          She has dogs because they belong to someone else in her family. Not “I HAVE two dogs” but “I LIVE WITH two dogs”. Compare to her statement: “I have close to 100 (breeder NOT hoarder).” And she takes care of them because she has the class to look after an animal she lives with, even if she doesn’t like said animal.

    6. fojap
      I don’t hate dogs. I’m afraid of some of them. I’m afraid of dogs large enough to hurt me who are off leash. I’m afraid of some neighborhood dogs who look like they can jump the fence and who run up barking madly if I forget and walk down the sidewalk near where they live. I really wish leash laws were more regularly enforced.
      I don’t hate animals at all, in fact, I’m known as something of an animal lover. However, I don’t anthropomorphize them and I respect them for what they are. Some animals are powerful and, yes, dangerous. People need to handle them in a manner appropriate to their nature. Clearly, many people with large, powerful dogs, not just pit bulls, but mastiffs, rottweilers and others, are not prepared to handle a powerful, potentially aggressive dog.
      I wish all these people who say they love pit bulls would work for a crackdown on dog fighting, irresponsible breeding and animal abuse rather than worrying about talking a few people who don’t like pit bulls into liking them. Do you seriously think you’re going to talk anyone on a blog entitled “Why I Hate Dogs” into adopting a pit bull? (This is my first time on this blog. I’ve never even seen it before, but the title is a big clue as to its orientation.) Personally, I don’t hate dogs and once even toyed with the notion of adopting one, but it’s no skin off my back if the owner of this site doesn’t like them. To each his own. I like cats. One of my closest friends, a dog person, hates them. He doesn’t hurt them, so what do I care.
      Frankly, I wouldn’t mind if dogs liked me a little less, because maybe they wouldn’t jump all over me and lick my face.
      The people who are trying to “rehabilitate” the image of pit bulls are putting animals in homes that may not be prepared to care for a dog like that properly. Advocates for most other breeds will have lists like: Do not adopt a ______ if, followed by a list of things an owner may or may not be prepared to do. For instance, greyhound advocates will tell you not to adopt a greyhound unless you have a very tall, palisade-type fence around your yard, not to adopt if you have small pets, etc. Yet pit bull advocates claim that pit bulls are seemingly the ideal pet for everyone. It’s not even an issue that interests me much, but my bs meter is triggered. There is no ideal pet for everyone.

  11. Blackcat6789
    My dad reads the TIME and usually calls me about it. I haven’t heard about it though. But i would expect this though, I’ve seen books, magazines and lots of other stuff about the good side of any dog.

  12. dogvictim
    The pitbull advocates have been attempting to “re-name” the breed for some time now. There have been rebranding campaigns in an effort to comfort the general public and promote adoption of the bully breed. Common pitbull names include American Bulldog, American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier. My crazy neighbor has two of the above varieties. Some of the cultists tried to rename it the New Yorkie. What is also troubling is that when the dog is bred with other breeds it may be harder to recognize yet still have all the genetic traits of an aggressive killer dog. Why these animals are not systematically spayed upon arrival is simply beyond me. I don’t believe these people are sincerely rescuers. They are dog obsessed pitbull promoter and their behavior is telling.

    1. snakelady
      Isn’t it amazing, that owners of dogs such as Golden Retrievers, dachshunds, Yorkies, pointers, etc. don’t feel the need to make excuses for ANY behaviors of their dogs…because their dogs don’t generally maul and kill. If these were attacks by sharks (the fishy kind) you wouldn’t see a bunch of half-literate nutjobs whinIng that the media is to blame for sharks being dangerous. I will never understand the pit nutter mentality.

  13. Brett
    I worked for a doggy daycare that allowed pit bulls to attend. Completely irresponsible now that I reflect back upon it, but hey, it was LA, people treat pitbulls like they’re pugs out there . Every other breed that would get into a scuffle or a fight always showed the typical signs of aggression or would give a warning growl before attempting to bite. It was easy to stop trouble from occurring with nearly every dog breed. However, the pit bulls never showed any visible signs or indicators before a fight, thus watching the pit bulls and staying hyper vigilant was essential around them, but it still didn’t stop one from taking a chunk off my coworker’s hand who was forced to pull off a pitbull that was latched onto another dog. I have no intense hatred of pit bulls in general, in fact, the ones I’ve encountered have always been friendly, so I felt fairly open-minded about there being such a thing as responsible pit bull owner. That being said, I’ve come to realize the breed has no purpose or reason to be peddled off as suitable pet. Every pit bull owner seems to be an expert at reading the body language of a pitbull dog, so I’m told there’s nothing I should be concerned about around the breed. So why are so many people still getting bitten and attacked with all these responsible owners who are out there? How these people convince themselves this is possible, is disturbing. Time and time again as I was sifting through pitbull attack articles, I kept seeing comments from pitbull owners who claimed what a responsible an owner they were. They would continue to espouse how friendly and good with children a pitbull is (look at my baby laying next to my dog!), how they leash the dog and fence their yard, and continue to go on to explain how well trained their pit is. As I kept reading what these pitbull owners were writing, I realized how intensely and quickly they were to spurn anyone that claimed pit bulls are prone to aggression. These people couldn’t even bear the thought that their loving pet could ever hurt anything, something that was also a common theme of the owners whose pitbull had just killed or attacked someone. These people undoubtedly chose to adopt or buy a pit bull knowing full well that the breed bears a stigma and that efforts to instate a legal ban on the breed are possible, and then vehemently rant how they hate anyone who wants to place restrictions on the pitbull because their pit is friendly to all dogs and people and doesn’t need any extra precautions taken to protect other people in public.
    I’ve owned two dobermans, yet never heard a doberman owner viciously attack and diminish anyone who has been attacked by one or thinks they’re scary. Because the majority of doberman owners will openly admit that the breed may be dog aggressive or potentially aggressive around unfamiliar visitors. We know this, and will take precautions at the first sign a doberman displays of aggression because indeed this breed of dog was not designed to quietly attack and not stop until it kills, and will show warning signs, typically a warning growl for another dog to back the eff off. You don’t tend to find a ton of doberman owners who fanatically explain that training a doberman not to bark and loving it enough will take away its ingrained instinct to protect. Because we know that this was a dog bred for protection, and don’t make ridiculously radical claims that genetics and history are distorted by people who hate dobermans and don’t actually have any meaning. Do you hear an abundance of doberman owners insisting all breeds are the same, and dobermans are no different, when one attacks? I guess we should start doing that more often, since pit bull owners are all over that band wagon. There are droves of comments highlighting how far too many pit bull owners have deluded themselves into believing that enough training and love means that they have miraculously cured their pitbull of decades and decades worth of genetically engineering a dog whose utmost instinct is to kill. These guys are miracle workers! They continue to believe that because they’ve never been bitten by a pitbull, it must mean the entire breed is made of docile, loving, creatures who would only attack under some vague definition of a “bad owner.” The pit bull is like any other dog breed! Blame the deed not the breed! They go to sickening lengths to malign victims of an attack or throw a fellow pit bull owners whose dogs have just attacked someone under the bus and then continue to believe that there is such a thing as a “responsible owner” of a breed designed for no other reason than to kill. Any responsible owner can clearly see the inherent risk and threat an unpredictable breed designed for the sheer purpose of killing poses, and logically concludes that owning such a dog, no matter how friendly it may seem, is not worth the amount of potential risk involved. Yet somehow, no other dog breed has received such a concerted and publicized effort to retool its public image like the pit bull, which I’ve discovered according to these owners is due to the organized effort to of the secret media conspiracy designed to destroy and euthanize every pitbull in existence, apparently. Man those media people are incredibly organized! Advocate groups, owners, and rescues go to absurd and disturbing lengths to prove this breed is a suitable family pet, rehabilitate aggressive dogs, revitalize the “nanny myth” and continue to push how friendly and misunderstood the pitbull is, and in the process, continue to put the life of an animal above any concern it my pose to the public. Couldn’t they choose to rehabilitate the tremendously abused greyhound, that has no history of mauling people’s pets or children once it’s adopted, instead? I guess the logical conclusion is that they’re greyhound racists or something… comparing a dog to a group of hateful and vicious people is all the same to them, right? Concealing and denying and distorting that this a dog breed capable of bringing down a horse, and telling the public that love and training will prevent any pitbull from ever reverting to its natural instincts, which in this case is killing, is beyond my understanding, and somehow worth it to these people to risk the innocent lives who are all too often put in their crossfire.
    When dobermans and Boston Terriers are bred for bloodsport and start mauling and killing people in alarming numbers, I won’t oppose placing a ban or restrictions on owning either breed. I’ll reconsider the liability of owning one, and realize there’s no logical reason for owning a pet genetically engineered to kill. Until that day comes, I will continue to feel nauseated by the people who feel that owning pitbulls, or any other dog designed and continually bred to kill, is something that should ever be placed over the value of hundreds of other adotable dog breeds, but more importantly, any human life.

  14. Rachel
    From what I’ve seen here, I feel as though a good deal of you are so filled with hatred that you are truly blind to anything that does not coincide with your beliefs. I don’t disagree that there are a number of ferocious Pit Bulls out there; however, this is not because they were hard-wired to be nasty, as many of you have said. Because of their threatening appearance, they are the chosen accessory for lowlife individuals (who purchase them solely to turn them into a “fighting dog” that will make them look tough and “cool”). When raised with responsible owners who know how to properly handle these animals, Pit Bulls are just as loving as any other pet.
    It’s not wrong to dislike dogs– everyone is entitled to their own opinions. But it is wrong to generalize and say that anyone who DOES like dogs is a bumbling idiot, or to contact Time Magazine and complain about a dog breed that you don’t fully understand. Yes, there are many irresponsible dog owners out there, and that is why people are attacked or bitten– you have every right to be upset with them. However, I ask you to stop being so hypocritical and have some respect. You say that all dog lovers are “stupid, sociopathic weirdos”, and think nothing of it; however, I know that all of you would be extremely livid if I called you the same thing simply because you didn’t like dogs.

    1. willko
      Read the reports of pit bull owners and their children who were killed by their “sweetest pit in the world”. The evidence is overwhelming. Only a small number of the fatalities are by unknown or problem dogs. IMO, most dogs are “accessories” since most don’t do anything but bark, eat and crap. However, pit bulls are unpredictable and potentially lethal. It has no place in the natural world because it is not of the natural world; it’s a bred murdering machine. Just look at the damned thing – a beast bred in hell. I wouldn’t hesitate to kill any roaming pitbull in my neck of the woods -period. It could mean the difference between life and death for some child, elderly person or even a loved one.

      1. Rachel
        This is exactly what I mean by irresponsible dog owners. Some people trust their pets- whether they be cats or dogs- alone and unsupervised with their children. Most kids treat pets very roughly, and anything can happen– even with “sweet” animals such as Labs or even cats.
        I agree that Pits maybe aren’t the best suited for a life with small children, as they are bred to be guard dogs. Other than that, if raised correctly, they really are very loyal creatures.

        1. anon
          Oh for heaven’s sake. They are bred for FIGHTING, not guarding. Once they’re on the attack, they won’t want to stop until their opposition is dead. I don’t trust these dogs, end of story.
          There are plenty of news stories about people being mauled or killed by pit bulls who were sweet and never had a problem, or so said everybody. And I’m not up for hearing the usual about how any dog can be dangerous, because while this is true, they’re not bred for the sudden, unprovoked, relentless attack of a pit bull–because pit bulls were created for FIGHTING. I don’t care what people say, GENETICS MATTER. Pointers point, collies herd, pit bulls FIGHT. They ARE hardwired to have horrifyingly aggressive behaviors, even if it doesn’t look that way. They are not parlor pets; when will people stop acting like they are?

    2. dogsfromhell
      Its about time for people to stand up and say we don’t want these dogs in our communities. The dog cultists are pushing hard for dogs and especially pitbulls to be accepted. Someone has to push back. There are animal control officials who are advocates for dogs against abuse. There is no one advocating for humans against the abuse we are subjected to by dogs. These abuses include being force fed dog noise, dog aggression, dog attack and even death by dog. Our communities are over run with dogs at every turn. In my town even the zoning officer who is the person handling noise “nuisance” complaints is a dog cultist. Yes we definitely need an official who will be our advocate against dogs.
      See Dr Craig Mixons research on the health hazards of dog noise. Not a “nuisance” at any level.

  15. Pinkamena Diane Pie
    So Pit Bull puppies to playful and/or obedient adults are evil?
    Please look at yourselves and tell me that you haven’t done things that were wrong/immoral/sinful,etc yourselves.
    -Pit Bulls are only ‘evil’ Dogs because of the way how they were raised by abusive/neglectful owners
    -Pit Bulls are only ‘evil’ Dogs because of how protective they can be to their owners, their owners that they got their love and care for
    The breed isn’t evil. It’s the way how they were raised is how their behavior will be. To playful to savage, it depends on who is RAISING the Dog. Yes, there are idiots who are lazy, don’t care if their Pit Bull attacked/killed a pet, raise the Pit Bull into being fighter Dogs,etc, but you got to remember that there ARE good people who do love their Pit Bulls, and train them/get them trained and play with them.
    Believing that the Pit Bull is an evil breed just makes you look ridiculous, I’m serious. :|

    1. anon
      I never said pit bulls were evil. I am frustrated with the way people act like their fighting and killing heritage can be suppressed by loving and training them enough. There are lots of stories where people were attacked by their pit bulls that were never abused or taught to be mean. 2-year-old Beau Rutledge was killed by a pit bull his family owned for eight years! The sooner people realize this dog is genetically hardwired to have aggressive tendencies, the better.

      1. Pinkamena Diane Pie
        These dogs have been bred for generations and generations to fight other animals and there is no way to train that out. I do not believe in the “it’s all in how you raise them” only. Yeah sure, training certainly plays a role in how an animal acts, but genetics will always have a bigger effect no matter what.
        Human Aggression however, is a major fault in this breed and APBTs have never been bred for human aggression. They were used to fight other dogs, not humans. There were human aggressive examples, but these dogs were far from the majority of the breed. Now, since the breed has gotten popular with idiots, there are more human aggressive examples than ever because of poor breeding. This is not how the breed is supposed to be though and a well bred APBT is usually a very people friendly dog.

        1. anon
          That doesn’t cancel out the staggering amount of people who have been mauled and killed by them. Many, many pits with blood on their mouths have been described as “people-friendly” by those who knew them. Dogs that were meant to be human-aggressive don’t seem to have as many attacks under their names. Perhaps more of the owners honestly acknowledge their history. Not just the breed’s original purpose, but also how it has behaved throughout its entire existence.
          Pit bulls are by and large the most protected and apologized-for of the dangerous breeds, and that makes them more so. I would not say the unbelievable amount of deaths by these dogs are solely the result of abuse, illegal fighting, and poor or neglected training. I believe there is a problem with the breed. Doctors and animal behaviorists have told time and time again how pit bulls are unpredictable–even with humans. They are disproportionately responsible for dog-related attacks and fatalities. Look here: http://www.fatalpitbullattacks.com/ Here we have recorded death-by-pit-bulls. At the bottom of the list there are accounts from the 1800s. So even then it paid to stay away from pits. Again, I don’t believe it was completely accounted to the way the dogs were raised: http://www.dogsbite.org/pdf/pit-bulls-gary-wilkes-spring-2010-off-lead.pdf

          1. Pinkamena Diane Pie
            Yes, there are many “Pit Bull” Attacks, but very few of those are caused by well bred examples of the breed. Up until maybe the mid 80′s, Human Aggressive APBTs were the minority. If a dog showed human aggression, it was usually culled. There are definitely exceptions to this, but manbiters weren’t nearly as common as they are now, because the owners and breeders of these dogs actually gave a crap about the breed and culled human aggressive dogs. Good APBT breeders still do this, and guess what? Very few “Vicious Pit Bulls” come from reputable breeders (Like Tatonka Kennels, The Colby family, etc) The “Pit Bulls” you see at shelters are usually scatterbred mutts from backyard breeders. Point is, I do agree most “Pibble owners” are total idiots who have no idea that they’re dealing with a powerful, intelligent animal with one heck of a prey drive. I also think that if you’re going to get a dog like this, you better get one from a good breeder, do a crap ton of research and get familiar with the breed. Pit bulls are not for everyone, but they seem to be the fad right now. There are only a handful of good breeders who care about the breed’s future and only a few owners who actually know the breed. This is why the breed’s reputation is in a rut right now. Pit bulls have been around a long time, if they’re so inherently evil why weren’t there Pit Bull attacks left and right before they became a fad?
            Don’t even get me started on Dogsbite. They get their “Facts” from freaking news reports for God’s sake!
        2. anon
          PDP — in response to your August 16 post: bad ownership is part of the problem. But I really do not understand the appeal of the pit bull as a pet. They were bred solely for the purpose of killing other animals as some sort of sick sport. Yeah, back then people had the SENSE to cull human-aggressive pits, but they also had the sense to treat the pit bull for what it was: a fighting machine. Not all pit bulls attack–I get that. I’m also open to the idea of a handful of owners really “getting” the breed. But it is appalling how much damage pit bulls have done in comparison to other dog breeds, and how people work so hard to paint them as some sort of total and utter victim of “haters”. It is utterly disregarding the families of people, owners of pets who have been killed by pits. People “hate” pit bulls for a reason. If bad ownership and breeding were really the only issues, there would be disproportionate amounts of people getting killed by Labrador retrievers. They’ve been America’s most popular dog for DECADES. There are bound to be just as many, if not more, irresponsible Lab owners as irresponsible pit owners. And Labs aren’t supposed to be aggressive toward people either!
          Again, I NEVER SAID PIT BULLS ARE EVIL. And I’m careful about what information I believe from BOTH sides of the pit debate. Gary Wilkes did not write a “news report”, he wrote about what it was like to grow up in the era in which dogfighting was legal.

          1. dogsfromhell
            Yes agreed..if bad ownership and breeding were the cause of pit bull aggression then clearly there would be more attacks by other breeds since we all know there is no shortage of irresponsible dog owners. Yet the majority of attacks are by bully dogs especially pit bulls.
    2. willko
      Hey cow, pits are an aggressive breed -period. If they weren’t they wouldn’t be the leading canine human killer. If you ignore data and facts than it is only you who looks “ridiculous’. Even people involved with the breed will recommend that certain pits be destroyed because they’re too dangerous. The term “evil” is perhaps subjective, but so is the belief that “it’s how they’re raised”.
      You’re just another deluded and foolish dog-worshiper with a big mouth. We see ‘em come and go around here.

      1. Pinkamena Diane Pie
        I’m not in any way “deluded” or “foolish” and I am certainly not a dog worshiper. I’ve researched APBTs for years, I know exactly what I’m talking about.
        Animal Aggression is an accepted and common trait in this breed, yes. These dogs have been bred for generations and generations to fight other animals and there is no way to train that out. I do not believe in the “it’s all in how you raise them” only. Yeah sure, training certainly plays a role in how an animal acts, but genetics will always have a bigger effect no matter what. I never denied that, I just said that raising them badly could also make things no better.
        Human Aggression however, is a major fault in this breed and APBTs have never been bred for human aggression. They were used to fight other dogs, not humans. There were human aggressive examples, but these dogs were far from the majority of the breed. Now, since the breed has gotten popular with idiots, there are more human aggressive examples than ever because of poor breeding. This is not how the breed is supposed to be though and a well bred APBT is usually a very people friendly dog.
        Besides that, too many breeds are called “Pit Bulls”, even if they aren’t! There are about 42 different breeds that are considered “Pit Bulls” and most of those dogs are guardian breeds. This combined with the increase of bad breeders that don’t cull (And yes, by cull I mean kill) HUMAN aggressive APBTs is why the bite statistics are so high.
        But then again, I forgot that nobody can like what YOU dislike, or they are labeled as “worshipers”! Just because somebody likes what you dislike, doesn’t always mean they “worship” it!
        You can call me a dog worshiper all you like, but I will call you and your “insults” silly and pathetic!

        1. anon
          Pit bull = American pit bull terrier, American Staffordshire terrier, Staffordshire bull terrier, American bulldog. That’s what I’ve heard.

        2. willko
          No one here gives a rat’s ass about the minutia of “dog knowledge’. All your “expertise” in APBT means nothing because any dog-worshiper/rescuer can proclaim themselves an “expert”. It’s not rocket surgery; there are no qualifications, certifications or professional standards. It’s mostly people like yourself, talking out of their ass. The same way the pit owner whose mutt just mauled and killed someone talks out of there’s. Maybe all your experience and “research”will get you an $8/hr job at pet smart -that’s what they pay their “experts”. Like I said, you have nothing but a big mouth.

          1. dogsfromhell
            Agreed! They are attention seekers and see their dog as an extension of themselves. The creatures validate them. One of the cultists on here imagines the demons bring so much joy to people. LOL It’s all delusional. I have been tortured by dog noise in three homes I have owned, my daughter in two. I have friends who contend with being force fed dog noise daily. I dont know anyone who owns a dog that doesnt seem frustrated by the constant high maintenance demands of these things. I continue to advocate for dog free living environments. More and more people are less afraid to tell the dog cultists they do not want dogs forced on them. The fact that the cultists feel compelled to comment on this site shows they feel threatened.
          2. willko
            dogsfromhell: Dogs are nothing but shit-eating scavengers that have become a perverse obsession for the more socially and emotionally impaired segment of the population.
            Anyone who has devoted what limited emotional and intellectual capacity they might have to these worthless POS is truly deserving of ridicule. I agree with you that they need to learn not everyone is impressed with their “dog knowledge” nor view their motive for “rescue” as a selfless act. Quite the opposite, 99% of them are self-absorbed assholes who have little sense of civility or decency. I like to give them a dose of their own medicine so they know what it feels like……
          3. dogsfromhell
            The whole “rescue” thing is really nauseating. The last idiot that lived next door to me went about telling everyone what a saint she was for “rescuing” her dog. I live in a suburban/urban classic town so many homes share a common wall. I knew very well the reality of her narcissism. She worked 7-4 and the large dog howled ALL DAY while crated next to my wall. She went out most Friday and Saturday nights while AGAIN the dog howled while crated. The dog howled while crated on Saturday afternoons when she went out to do her errands. When she entertained the dog was banished to a back room where it howled while crated for the duration of her party. The dog was so lonely and needy it even howled when the repair guys left after working in her house. She never walked it or let it run in her fenced in yard. She would tie it to her porch for a few minutes each weekend. Her excuse was that he was like her child who cried himself to sleep when she left. I am sure the dog was thrilled to see her each day when she got home. I suppose she felt needed if only by a desperate dog. She really got off bragging about how she saved the dog and gained plenty of attention. I never understood how this was being “rescued”. It’s laughable. The bullshit about it being “like your child”…its a good thing she wasnt the mother of a real child because protective services would have been hauling her away. So yes these types of dyfunctional human/dog relationships typically serve the needs of the human. I have read some information stating that the number of actual rescue dogs is highly inflated and is simply a way for dog sellers to promote their product(dogs) and sell more dogs. I believe this is very likely. As for me, if I had a hero complex I would rather help an organization rescuing trafficked children and women.
          4. Pinkamena Diane Pie
            I never said you should give a rats ass about that.
            You are simply one pathetic person. You only argument is moaning about something as silly as that? Pathetic person you are.
          5. willko
            No Pink Pie, my argument is that you’re just another loud-mouthed dog “expert” (AKA dog-worshiper) who thinks they’re going to come here and “enlighten” us dog-haters. Hopefully, like the rest of the dog-cult cretins, you’ll go away with a new perspective that the limits of dog tolerance and acceptance have been exceeded for the more civil and social members of society. We’re fed-up with noisy neighborhoods, dog-shit everywhere and mindless devotion to a stupid inbred shit-eating scavengers by a segment of the population who gave up on normal inter-human relationships and chose to remain socially and intellectually stunted for the rest of their lives. The entire dog-cult is an aberration of normal society and should be recognized as such, especially you pitters -the sickest and most narcissistic of the bunch.
          6. Pinkamena Diane Pie
            Also Wilko(or whatever you’re name is), I would also like to say this as well, as another little add-on to the argument, seeing as I felt my last post wasn’t enough:
            Yes, there are many “Pit Bull” Attacks, but very few of those are caused by well bred examples of the breed. Up until maybe the mid 80′s, Human Aggressive APBTs were the minority. If a dog showed human aggression, it was usually culled. There are definitely exceptions to this, but manbiters weren’t nearly as common as they are now, because the owners and breeders of these dogs actually gave a crap about the breed and culled human aggressive dogs. Good APBT breeders still do this, and guess what? Very few “Vicious Pit Bulls” come from reputable breeders (Like Tatonka Kennels, The Colby family, etc) The “Pit Bulls” you see at shelters are usually scatterbred mutts from backyard breeders. Point is, I do agree most “Pibble owners” are total idiots who have no idea that they’re dealing with a powerful, intelligent animal with one heck of a prey drive. I also think that if you’re going to get a dog like this, you better get one from a good breeder, do a crapton of research and get familiar with the breed. Pit bulls are not for everyone, but they seem to be the fad right now. There are only a handful of good breeders who care about the breed’s future and only a few owners who actually know the breed. This is why the breed’s reputation is in a rut right now. Pit bulls have been around a long time, if they’re so inherently evil why weren’t there Pit Bull attacks left and right before they became a fad?
            Don’t even get me started on Dogsbite. They get their “Facts” from freaking news reports for God’s sake. Any way, I won’t deny that there are a lot of Pit Bull attacks, but what I’m saying is that is not because of the breed itself. It is because of irresponsible breeders and trainers. Like I said before, a good breeder culls human aggressive dogs.
            Despite all of this, What about all of the APBTs that go their entire lives without even growling at a person? Are they vicious too?
            Pit Bulls are a fad breed right now and that isn’t working in their favor. There are many, many APBTs, so for every pit that bites someone, there are so many more that don’t.
            I never claimed to be an expert, you called me “Foolish”. I was defending myself, because it seemed like you were lumping me into the same category as the “Pibble” people. It appears you just go to Anti Pit Bull sites loaded with fake statistics, so who’s the “Foolish” one now?
            Again I never claimed to be an expert, don’t put words in my mouth. I just said that I knew dogs. If stating my opinion gives me a “Big Mouth” then I guess that makes you a big mouth as well.
            My dog (Who happens to be part Pit bull, by the way.) Is well trained, is kept on a leash and doesn’t go around mauling people. I have much more than a “Big Mouth” (see? that’s how you use quotation marks. You put them on things the other person actually said.) I have the experience to back up my arguments. I am well aware that my dog could maul someone, but she won’t. Besides the fact that she’s not aggressive towards people, she’s well trained and I know how to handle her. She would attack another dog, I will be the first to admit that, but I know how to handle her and I can keep that from happening.
            Not all of us “Dog Worshipers” are blind idiots that think our dogs are sweet angels that can do no wrong.
            And lol, Petsmart? Really, man?
            I know that was supposed to be a joke (and not a very good one, at that) but are quite a few professions involving dogs. Ever heard of professional Dog Trainers?
            Regardless, I don’t even want a dog related career. Just because I like dogs, doesn’t mean I want a job involving them. I’m probably gonna do animation any way… or car design perhaps.
          7. dogsfromhell
            Wilko,
            It doesnt seem to matter how many times you/we tell the dog worshippers we could care less about reading their “extensive knowledge” of dog trivia. They STILL love to blather on as if any of it matters. It’s so incredibly boring and doesn’t cancel out the fact that dogs are documented aggressors. Ditzy Diane sounds remarkably like the other one you used to *itch slap regularly. I think you referred to her as C word. LOL. Could be her with a new screen name or also as likely is that all the dog cultists have the same mantra. geez……….
          8. willko
            dogsfromhell: Anyone showing up here as a dog advocate is fair game. They’re so used to positive reinforcement from other dog-worshipers, the pet industry, or at the very least folks who don’t assert themselves in the unwanted presence of dogs, that they become arrogant and presumptuous. IMO, their inbred devotion to their fleabags compromises their intellect and reasoning so it’s not that difficult to slap them around. If anything, it’s at least entertaining. It’s unfortunate that the arrogance of dog-worship negatively effects so many aspects of non-dog folks, from quality of life issues to personal health and safety.
          9. Pinkamena Diane Pie
            And as for the your other comment Wilko:
            “No Pink Pie”
            …Uh… I really have no idea how to respond to this…
            I’m not a friggin’ brony, dude. I wasn’t going to comment on the fact that you’re a brony, but since you brought it up it’s fair game now.
            “my argument is that you’re just another loud-mouthed dog “expert” (AKA dog-worshiper) who thinks they’re going to come here and “enlighten” us dog-haters”
            Actually, I am not a “Dog Worshiper” or “expert” by any means. I am just a person who happens to like dogs. Sue me.
            “Hopefully, like the rest of the dog-cult cretins, you’ll go away with a new perspective that the limits of dog tolerance and acceptance have been exceeded for the more civil and social members of society.”
            I support ear cropping, dog breeding and tethering, so I don’t really get along with all the Bleeding Heart fur mommy types. I do realize that dogs have been put on a pedestal and I do not support it. I believe people should always come before animals. I never said otherwise, but it seems like you love to put words in my mouth and completely ignore everything I say..
            “We’re fed-up with noisy neighborhoods, dog-shit everywhere and mindless devotion to a stupid inbred shit-eating scavengers by a segment of the population who gave up on normal inter-human relationships and chose to remain socially and intellectually stunted for the rest of their lives.”
            Believe me, I don’t like this either. I don’t like the dogs that crap everywhere and bark constantly anymore than you do.
            And I just have to say, my human relationships haven’t suffered one bit from owning my dog and my grades haven’t slipped either. Owning a dog doesn’t automatically make you a socially retarded idiot, get off your freaking high horse.
            “The entire dog-cult is an aberration of normal society and should be recognized as such, especially you pitters -the sickest and most narcissistic of the bunch.”
            First off, I love how you’re saying dog lovers are weird, yet most people own or at least like dogs.
            And you’re calling me narcissistic, yet this whole time you’ve been acting like you’re some kind of superior, intelligent being simply because you don’t like dogs.
            Again, I’m not a Pitter, I’m a person who happens to like Pit Bulls. How many times do I have to repeat that?
            And this is where the brony part comes in.
            You have the freaking nerve to call me a “Dog Worshiper”, When you belong to one of the most attention hungry, pervert filled cults on the internet.
            You say I’m socially retarded? You watch a show for 5 year old girls.
            I am not against Bronies, but if you’re going to sink as low as to call me a “Dog Worshiper”, I will go just as low.
          10. willko
            Pink Pie: You have something you need to emotionally defend, we don’t. That’s always the case when dog-worshipers show up here and why they never do well in a debate. Logically, it really shouldn’t matter to you what we think; but you need to defend your animals and your belief in them the same way any religious fanatic defends their god. Hopefully, you’ll have learned something and leave here not being so self-assured in the belief everyone likes you and your dog. That’s one of the purposes of this site -to educate dog-worshipers…..
          11. Pinkamena Diane pie
            First of all, I find it hilarious that you’re trying to make me look stupid by calling me “Pink Pie”. I mean… Really? What does that even mean…?
            There hasn’t been any logic in any of your arguments this entire time. The closest you’ve gotten to “facts” has been a link to a website that gets all of its information from freaking news reports.
            How is that “educating” anyone? It sounds like name calling and slander to me.
            Second of all, I would have done the same thing if this was about cats, fish, lizards, snakes, etc. This isn’t a “Stop messing with my favorite animal” thing. It’s not the opinion that bothers me, I can accept that people don’t like dogs. The thing that bugged me was the fact that you stated “facts” that were not only false, but very serious. Heck, I don’t like rodents, but I don’t make websites about how much I hate them and make up stuff like “all rodent owners are filthy”.
            And just to clear things up (AGAIN) I do not worship dogs at all, I simply like them. I don’t believe ‘everyone’ likes me, in fact I know quite a few people on this site can’t stand me. I can maybe name two people who I would say “like” me. I’m okay with that too, my life doesn’t revolve around the internet and I really don’t give a crap about what random people on the internet think.
            Also, I’ll say this again: Get off your freaking high horse. You are not in any way better than me simply because you hate an animal that I happen to like. If anyone is being “Narcissistic” here, it’s you!
  16. dogsfromhell
    “Believing the Myth is What Left Us Without a Son”
    I’m sure most of you have heard about 14-month old Daxton Borchardt who was brutally mauled to death by his babysitter’s two pit bulls while under her care on 3/6/2013. His father Jeff tells the full story of what happened on March 6th and the devastating aftermath in the months following the young boy’s savage death.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEFCH6btvng&feature=youtu.be
    We should support this effort as a community. NO MORE DEAD KIDS
    We can also pledge to stay informed. I think we should all do this if only to show our support

  17. dogsfromhell
    Another Pit Bull Attack-Dont Believe the Myth:
    Wednesday, August 7, 2013
    SOLON OH – AN AMERICAN BULLDOG ATTACKED A 3-YEAR-OLD BOY WHEN HIS PARENT STOPPED TO TALK TO ITS OWNER
    On August 1 a dog attack resulted in a Solon boy, 3, being taken to Hillcrest Hospital where he received stitches on his head and ear. The child was walking with a parent and some other children along a path to a nearby playground when the parent stopped to talk to the AMERICAN BULLDOG’S owner. The dog came up and sniffed the boy but then started biting him on the ear knocking him to the ground and continuing the attack until being pulled off. The case has been turned over to the city’s animal warden to determine if charges should be brought.
    http://www.cleveland.com/solon/index.ssf/2013/08/solon_police_blotter_for_8813.html

    1. willko
      I took the liberty to paste a very informative comment from the link you provided.
      “The so-called American Bulldog is just another pit bull type dog — a pit bull bred up to weigh twice as much. The history of the ‘bull’ dog began in England, somewhere in the middle ages. It took hundreds of years of selective breeding to create dogs aggressive enough that they were fit for bull- and bear-baiting. The sport had its heyday during the reigns of Henry VIII and his daughter Elizabeth I, but as the law slowly abolished the torture of humans, public opinion began to turn also against the torture of animals for sport. In 1835, Britain passed a law that abolished bull- and bear-baiting.
      The people – in particular the breeders supplying the dogs and those who ran the gambling rackets – had to turn to some other avenue of livelihood. Pitting ‘bull’ dogs against each other became the thing. No need to have, sustain and hide a bull or a bear. No need for an elaborate fighting pit that was big enough to protect the audience from a bear fighting for its life against a bunch of bulldogs. The bulldogs were cheaper to keep, required only an improvised fighting pit, and could be quickly hidden if police were on the way. Some lines were modified by adding terrier. This didn’t lead to losing the bulldog’s love of a fight to the death but made the dogs smaller. These smaller bulldogs were easy to transport on Naval ships, and so the British fighting dogs spread around the world.
      It had taken a thousand years of careful breeding to create these specialized fighters / baiters that are so unlike any normal domestic dog. The British breeding program was so successful that these fighting dogs were used all over the world to increase the fighting tenacity of indigenous fighting and/or mastiff breeds. Never before or since was an experiment in changing the domestic dog so successful as the British thousand-years bulldog one. Even today, mixing in this type of dog is the only way to create new aggressive ‘breeds’. It doesn’t matter what you mix the bulldog type with, the trait will prevail — it’s genetic and strongly heritable.

  18. dogsfromhell
    Here is an excerpt from a posting on http://sruv-pitbulls.blogspot.com/
    “Sudden, Random, Unprovoked, Violent
    Pit bulls In a Humane Society”
    “…advocates are fond of mentioning that many pit bulls live without incident as gentle pets. These advocates ignore more compelling facts. 321 humans have been killed or disfigured by dogs during calendar year 2013; 316 of those attacks were by pit bulls. 16 of the attacks have caused human fatalities, 15 of those deaths were caused by pit bulls.”
    Pit bull homicides need to be stopped BEFORE they happen, NOT AFTER.

    1. willko
      I’ve always considered dog-worshipers just another ignorant exploitable consumer demographic. Much of the editorial defense of pits in the main-stream media comes from pet industry and breeders who make a killing (pun intended) from the pet consumers subconscious lack of self-esteem. A pit is nothing more than a status symbol, same as a giant turbo 4×4 diesel truck for the office worker daily commute.

  19. willko
    Funny how the personality of dog-worshipers coincide with that of their animals. Pink Pie is all over this thread like a Pit Bull – mindless, tenacious and antagonistic towards the unfamiliar……..

    1. dogsfromhell
      …..And a needy attention seeker….She can go vomit her dog mantra to the other cultists.If she is such an “enlightened” dog cultist then she can do her part by educating THEM. We’ll look forward to a changed dog worshipper culture…LOL…I say we cut her off

      1. willko
        As you mentioned before, something vaguely similar to C Word’s comments. Doesn’t matter, she hasn’t gotten any smarter……

  20. John
    Check this out — it’s crazy how much in denial people over at Buzzfeed are. How many people have to die before people take the pit bull threat seriously?
    http://www.buzzfeed.com/chelseamarshall/37-pictures-that-will-restore-your-faith-in-pit-bulls

    1. dogsfromhell
      John, that site was sickening. I couldnt even get through that garbage. The hysterical thing is that whoever made that site thinks pit bulls are cute????!!!! Are they serious??They look like devils with their tiny beady eyes and pointed ears that stick up like horns. Best case scenario is that the creepy “smile” looks like the Joker. But that’s how delusional the cultists are. They imagine this might change someones mind. Nauseating…..

  21. Doghater
    Fact- Pitbulls Kill. They kill more than any other breed. They kill beautiful innocent little babies, your neighbour’s little boy outside playing catch, that elderly lady out to get her mail. Often these attacks are unprovoked and come without warning.
    Fact- These attacks and murders are 100% preventable! If you could prevent child abduction/rape/murder 100% would you not do it?! What is wrong with these despicable beast owners- completely selfish!!!
    Solution- Annihilate the speices- Hell annihilate the entire canines as a whole!

  22. Anonymous
    I think it’s awesome people are starting to realize that not all pit bulls are bad! My god there are so many ignorant assholes on this site that can’t get their damn story strait! Every pit bull I have met was super sweet it is all about the way you raise the dog, and animal can attack someone depending on how they were raised.. I am so tired of you people judging every single dog from what a few did what about all of the dogs that have saved people’s lives? Dogs have done more for this world than you ever will.

  23. Doghater
    Dogs have done more for this world than I ever will? bahaha have you been huffing glue? Jesus, give your head a shake you’re clearly stuck on stupid.

  24. Anonymous
    What about all the people in this world that have killed other people? You want to annihilate all them too? Hypocrisy. Please don’t reproduce. Have a very nice day.

  25. Canetoad
    Pinkamena Diane Pie sounds like some ridiculous pedigree name. You can blabber on all you like but what you fail to realise is that you are more than welcome to live with your pooping mutts – pitbulls or whatever. Just don’t inflict them on people who hate the sight of them.

    1. Death To Pitbulls
      The name is actually the name that fans give of the depressed version of a character from a stupid kids show.

  26. dogsfromhell
    09/28/2013
    ANOTHER PIT BULL MURDERS A CHILD
    BAKER CITY, Ore. — An entire town is in mourning after a pit bull attack led to the death of a local 5-year-old-boy.
    Those who knew the toddler, along with the entire town of Baker City are both saddened and shocked by the sudden young death.
    School Superintendent Walt Wegener told KTVB an incident involving a dog took the kindergartner’s life on Friday.
    “He was dropped off for babysitting and ended up being taken to the hospital where he was pronounced dead in the middle of the morning,” said Wegener.
    Due to Baker School District’s four-days a week schedule for students, the child was not at school, but with a babysitter instead.
    Baker City police are now investigating and won’t release many details on the matter, but they did say that the death occurred at a home in the city and that a pit bull was involved.
    “I’m sure whenever police are ready with their investigation, they will release more information to the media,” said Wegener. “Right now, what we know is we lost one of our own and we need to take care of the rest of them.”
    There’s no word yet on the owner of the dog, but the sheriffs office told KTVB that the dog had been impounded following the attack.
    Wegener told KTVB that the school staff have been notified and counselors will be ready at the schools on Monday.
dogsfromhell September 28, 2013 at 8:40 am
09/28/2013
ANOTHER PIT BULL MURDERS A CHILD
BAKER CITY, Ore. — An entire town is in mourning after a pit bull attack led to the death of a local 5-year-old-boy.
Those who knew the toddler, along with the entire town of Baker City are both saddened and shocked by the sudden young death.
School Superintendent Walt Wegener told KTVB an incident involving a dog took the kindergartner’s life on Friday.
“He was dropped off for babysitting and ended up being taken to the hospital where he was pronounced dead in the middle of the morning,” said Wegener.
Due to Baker School District’s four-days a week schedule for students, the child was not at school, but with a babysitter instead.
Baker City police are now investigating and won’t release many details on the matter, but they did say that the death occurred at a home in the city and that a pit bull was involved.
“I’m sure whenever police are ready with their investigation, they will release more information to the media,” said Wegener. “Right now, what we know is we lost one of our own and we need to take care of the rest of them.”
There’s no word yet on the owner of the dog, but the sheriffs office told KTVB that the dog had been impounded following the attack.
Wegener told KTVB that the school staff have been notified and counselors will be ready at the schools on Monday.
Rachel Michelle October 17, 2013 at 6:53 pm
Rachel, I loved what you had to say. I agree with you 100%. It’s amazing how quick people are to point fingers at an animal. Getting rid of pit bulls will do nothing. It all comes down to irresponsible pet ownership. I see things like this all the time. I’m a CVT working at a city animal shelter. When I first started, I was shocked to see the amount of purebred Siberian Huskies we received. But then it was explained to me. People get them because of how pretty they are, and then the dog becomes reactive because he’s kept in a crate all day. A husky is a WORKING dog! They weren’t meant to be kept in a crate! Of course he’ll be destructive. No one bothers to research the breed that they get. And no animal should EVER be left alone with a child. Doesn’t anyone remember the saying, “A cat will take the baby’s breath away”? Cats don’t have magical powers, therefore, they can’t literally steal a baby’s breath. BUT cats love warmth. A sleeping baby seems like a heating pad to a cat. The cat doesn’t understand, cuddles up on the baby’s chest, and the baby suffocates. Is it the cat’s fault? No. Why was the cat in with the baby? What irresponsible parent leaves a child with an animal. It doesn’t matter how loving and loyal your pet is. It is an animal. Sometimes people have the best intentions and still screw up. I won’t deny that there are plenty of irresponsible people out there who own pit bulls. I’m not saying pit bulls can’t be destructive. But ANY dog can be. Pit bulls sell. Say what you will about pit bulls being dangerous, but we will always hear more about that than any other attack because it’s a juicy story. Rachel, thanks for your wonderful post. It was refreshing after reading so much bitterness.
dogsfromhell October 17, 2013 at 9:05 pm
2013 CANINE HOMICIDES
MOST OF THE PERPETRATORS WERE PITBULLS
On January 8, 2013, Betty Todd, 65, was killed in Hodges, South Carolina, by 4 pit bulls belonging to her son, as she was babysitting for his children.
On January 19, 2013, Christian Gormanous, 4, of Montgomery County, Texas, was killed by a killed by a chained pit bull in a neighbor’s yard.
On February 11, 2013, Elsie Grace, 91, was killed by two pit bulls in a motel room she shared with her son, the owner of pit bulls, in Hemet, California.
On February 16, 2013, Isaiah Aguilar, 2 years old, was killed by a neighbor’s pit bull which was chained in its yard. This happened in Sabinal, Texas.
On March 2, 2013, in Galesburg, Illinois, Ryan Maxwell, a 7-year old boy was mauled to death by a pit bull at a relative’s house. His mother said, “Half of his face was gone. And all of his throat. They had a wash cloth over half his face and his throat covered up. This thing did that to him. This thing just took our heart. It just took our soul.”
On March 6, 2013, Daxton Borchardt, a 14-month-old boy, was killed by his babysitter’s two pit bulls in Walworth, Wisconsin.
On March 29, 2013, 21-month-old Monica Laminack was killed by her family’s 7 pit bulls in Ellabelle, Georgia.
On April 2, 2013, Tyler Jett, 7-years-old, of Callaway, Florida, was savagely attacked by a neighbor’s two pit bull-mixed dogs, and the boy died on April 7, 2013. The dog owner, Edward Daniels II, has been charged with manslaughter.
On April 11, 2013, Claudia Gallardo, 38, was killed by a pit bull in the front yard of its owner’s house in Stockton, California. The adult child and two minor children who survive Ms. Gallardo retained Attorney Kenneth M. Phillips, the author of Dog Bite Law, to pursue the liable parties for the wrongful death of their mother.
On April 22, 2013, Jordyn Arndt, a 4-year-old girl, was killed at her babysitter’s house in Prarie City, Iowa, by the latter’s pit bull. The babysitter, Jena Wright, 24, has been charged with two felonies and several misdemeanors in connection with this incident. One of the criminal allegations” “Defendant knowingly acted in a manner that created a substantial risk to the child’s physical safety by leaving her unattended with a large American Staffordshire dog.” This type of dog is one of the group known as “pit bulls.”
On April 24, 2013, a 2-year-old boy named Beau Rutledge was killed in his home by his parents’ 8-year-old pit bull in Fulton County, Georgia.
On May 4, 2013, Rachael Honabarger, 35, a resident of Coshocton, Ohio, died after being attacked several days earlier by her husband’s German shepherd.
On May 9, 2013, Pamela Devitt, 63, was killed by 4 pit bulls running at large as she took a walk in Antelope Valley, California, about 65 miles east of Los Angeles. The owner of the dogs was Alex Donald Jackson, 29, a resident of the area. The dogs had inflicted 150 to 200 puncture wounds all over her body. The pit bulls and Jackson had been involved in an attack on a horse and its rider months earlier. For these reasons, Jackson has been charged with murder. Learn more about The Pamela Devitt Case (People v. Alex Jackson) in a special section of this website.
On May 12, 2013, Carlton Freeman, 80, of Harleyville, South Carolina, died from a dog mauling that happened on May 8th. This man was a double amputee who was attacked in his wheelchair. The breeds of the dogs have not been revealed.
On June 9, 2013, Ayden Evans, a 5-year-old boy who resides in Moore, Oklahoma, was killed in Jessieville, in Garland County, Arkansas, when he was attacked by a Bullmastiff dog inside the home of a family friend.
On June 18, 2013, Nephi Selu, a boy of 5, residing in Dixon, California, was staying at his grandparent’s home in Union City, near San Francisco, California, when he was killed by their pit bulls.
On June 25, 2013, a chained pit bull killed a 5-year-old girl named Arianna Jolee Merrback of Effingham, Florence County, South Carolina.
On July 1, 2013, 63-year-old Linda Oliver of Dayton, Texas, was killed by a rottweiler-mastiff mix that she and her husband owned.
dogsfromhell October 20, 2013 at 5:13 am
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/05/06/mother-attacked-by-pack-of-pit-bulls-as-she-protects-6-year-old
Mother Attacked by Pitbulls As She Protects 6 Year Old Daughter
dogsfromhell October 20, 2013 at 5:36 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5-yP8wjLiU
Pit Bull Attacks Baby in Bassinet
anon October 21, 2013 at 11:59 pm
I am sure the first thing out of your mouth when a child gets mauled by a pit or any other dog is that it is the child’s fault. When it is the stupid owner’s fault for letting the dog near a child in the first place, thinking it’s so friendly and loves children.
dogvictim October 24, 2013 at 9:47 am
Are Pit Bulls Really Dangerous
This article asks and answers the question
“Are Pitbulls Really Dangerous?”
Do pit bulls deserve their reputation as vicious “attack” dogs? An overwhelming amount of evidence suggests they do.
A five-year review of dog-bite injuries from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, published in 2009 in the journal Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, found that almost 51 percent of the attacks were from pit bulls, almost 9 percent were from Rottweilers and 6 percent were from mixes of those two breeds.
In other words, a whopping two-thirds of the hospital’s dog-attack injuries involved just two breeds, pit bulls and Rottweilers.
Other studies confirm these statistics: A 15-year study published in 2009 in the American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology revealed that pit bulls, Rottweilers and German shepherds were responsible for the majority of fatal dog attacks in the state of Kentucky. [See What Your Dog’s Breed Says About You]
And a 2011 study from the Annals of Surgery revealed that “attacks by pit bulls are associated with higher morbidity rates, higher hospital charges and a higher risk of death than are attacks by other breeds of dogs.”
The authors of that 2011 study go on to say, “Strict regulation of pit bulls may substantially reduce the U.S. mortality rates related to dog bites.”
Douglas Wolfe
Victims of Pit Bulls Foundation
pitbullvictims.org
Alex October 30, 2013 at 5:16 am
Pit bulls aren’t the problem?
My 5 year old sister was attacked by a pit bull; it gave her 3 deep rooted bites before my brother gave it a nice kick to the side of the face followed by a stomping.
The neighbors didn’t even apologize, instead they just cursed us and blamed my sister for ” not running away”.
Dog lovers are just twisted, biased and inconsiderate cretins.
Pinkamena Diane Pie October 31, 2013 at 11:51 pm
Here’s the thing. Dogs, like people, have personalities that vary widely. That german shepard is courageous, that rottweiler is more timid. That dachshund is tenacious, that borzoi is easygoing. That bulldog is very sociable, while that poodle is very aloof. The way dogs act is not based on their breeding, so much as the way they are treated. Yes, pit bulls were bred to fight other dogs. But it’s not like that is engraved into their personalities as it is with their anatomy! Because, ya know, being built to fight other animals is, as a matter of fact, EXTREMELY DIFFERENT from being trained to fight other animals. They are only built to fight, their structures prove that, but it’s not like they have had a thirst for blood since puppyhood.
Dogs are not automatically wired to be violent, even if it was what they were made to be. Like I said, all dogs have vastly different personalities. Sure, you have vicious dogs (*coughs* THEY WERE MORE THAN LIKELY ABUSED BECAUSE HUMANS ACTUALLY HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO BE PURPOSEFULLY AND NOT INSTINCTIVELY VIOLENT *coughs*), and then you have the sweet dogs that lick your hand and sit in your lap because DOGS ARE DOMESTICATED ANIMALS.
So nurture vs. nature once again comes onto play.
Now allow me to throw some statistics at you, because 100% facts would probably be more believable for you than my ramblings.
Here is a list of dog attack fatalities vs. the overall population of said breed (from the American Kennel Club (AKC), American Dog Breeders Association (A.D.B.A.) and United Kennel Club (UKC):
Apx 800.000 – 67 Fatal Attacks German Shepherds .008375%
Apx. 960,000 – 70 Fatal Attacks Rottweiler .00729%
Apx. 128.000 – 18 Fatal Attacks Great Dane .01416%
Apx. 114,000 – 14 Fatal Attacks Doberman .012288%
Apx. 72,000 – 10 Fatal Attacks St Bernard .0139%
Apx. 240,000 – 12 Fatal Attacks Chow Chow .005%
Apx 5,000,000- 60 Fatal Attacks American Pit Bull Terrier .0012%
A tad more than other dogs, yes, but THEY HAVE THE HIGHEST POPULATION OUT OF ALL OF THEM.
And pit bulls aren’t always used for fighting. Dog fighting has become more of an underground network, and is very illegal, so of course less dogs are being dragged into it, and more are being rehabilitated and such from being found in such a situation.
They are used for therapy work, search and rescue work, and as bomb/drug sniffing dogs (keep in mind that these dogs are not trained to attack, they are only used for searches).
Pit bulls are also known to be good with kids (earning them the “nanny dog” nickname). Seriously, they’re so well known for their good behavior with children that they got a NICKNAME.
In conclusion: Pit bulls are not naturally dangerous animals. There are hundreds of studies and stats PROVING that. The only ignorant person around here is you.
Pinkamena Diane Pie October 31, 2013 at 11:54 pm
How are they NOT cute?
Pinkamena Diane Pie October 31, 2013 at 11:55 pm
I think I couldn’t of said it any better.
Pinkamena Diane Pie October 31, 2013 at 11:56 pm
Here’s the thing. Dogs, like people, have personalities that vary widely. That german shepard is courageous, that rottweiler is more timid. That dachshund is tenacious, that borzoi is easygoing. That bulldog is very sociable, while that poodle is very aloof. The way dogs act is not based on their breeding, so much as the way they are treated. Yes, pit bulls were bred to fight other dogs. But it’s not like that is engraved into their personalities as it is with their anatomy! Because, ya know, being built to fight other animals is, as a matter of fact, EXTREMELY DIFFERENT from being trained to fight other animals. They are only built to fight, their structures prove that, but it’s not like they have had a thirst for blood since puppyhood.
Dogs are not automatically wired to be violent, even if it was what they were made to be. Like I said, all dogs have vastly different personalities. Sure, you have vicious dogs (*coughs* THEY WERE MORE THAN LIKELY ABUSED BECAUSE HUMANS ACTUALLY HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO BE PURPOSEFULLY AND NOT INSTINCTIVELY VIOLENT *coughs*), and then you have the sweet dogs that lick your hand and sit in your lap because DOGS ARE DOMESTICATED ANIMALS.
So nurture vs. nature once again comes onto play.
Now allow me to throw some statistics at you, because 100% facts would probably be more believable for you than my ramblings.
Here is a list of dog attack fatalities vs. the overall population of said breed (from the American Kennel Club (AKC), American Dog Breeders Association (A.D.B.A.) and United Kennel Club (UKC):
Apx 800.000 – 67 Fatal Attacks German Shepherds .008375%
Apx. 960,000 – 70 Fatal Attacks Rottweiler .00729%
Apx. 128.000 – 18 Fatal Attacks Great Dane .01416%
Apx. 114,000 – 14 Fatal Attacks Doberman .012288%
Apx. 72,000 – 10 Fatal Attacks St Bernard .0139%
Apx. 240,000 – 12 Fatal Attacks Chow Chow .005%
Apx 5,000,000- 60 Fatal Attacks American Pit Bull Terrier .0012%
A tad more than other dogs, yes, but THEY HAVE THE HIGHEST POPULATION OUT OF ALL OF THEM.
And pit bulls aren’t always used for fighting. Dog fighting has become more of an underground network, and is very illegal, so of course less dogs are being dragged into it, and more are being rehabilitated and such from being found in such a situation.
They are used for therapy work, search and rescue work, and as bomb/drug sniffing dogs (keep in mind that these dogs are not trained to attack, they are only used for searches).
Pit bulls are also known to be good with kids (earning them the “nanny dog” nickname). Seriously, they’re so well known for their good behavior with children that they got a NICKNAME.
She includes a lot of information about pits in the description (and as you can see I have used some of it because it is amazing and backed-up by many reliable resources).
In conclusion: Pit bulls are not naturally dangerous animals. There are hundreds of studies and stats PROVING that. The only ignorant person around here is you.
dogsfromhell November 1, 2013 at 5:07 am
Too much dog trivia….we could care less…we hate dogs . They bark, stink, crap inside and outside, pollute our water, attack and most of all kill children. PS If you knew as many “facts” LOL about children as you do about dogs your kids might not be at risk.
dogsfromhell November 1, 2013 at 7:52 pm
http://thetruthaboutpitbulls.blogspot.com/2010/08/nanny-dog-myth-revealed.html
Read about how the “Nanny Dog” myth began
The first anon November 2, 2013 at 12:06 am
“Yes, pit bulls were bred to fight other dogs. But it’s not like that is engraved into their personalities as it is with their anatomy! Because, ya know, being built to fight other animals is, as a matter of fact, EXTREMELY DIFFERENT from being trained to fight other animals.”
So, does this mean the next time a herding dog nips my thigh or runs around me in circles over and over again–as they quite often do–I can assume it was because the owner trained them to herd? If a basset hound drowns out its owners commands to follow a scent, it was trained to follow scents? If a greyhound kills your neighbor’s pet rabbit, was it trained to kill rabbits? All dogs were made with a purpose, and those purposes are engraved into them at least somewhat with genetics. You don’t need to train a pit bull to fight — or any other fighting breed. Pit bulls, however, have been a prime choice for fighting because they were made solely for it, and as such, the traits that make a champion fighting dog have been grossly exaggerated. One of these traits is unpredictability, which was advantageous because it gave the dog an edge in a fight. The pit bull’s unpredictability has served time and time again, as seen in the all-too-many cases of people and other animals being gravely injured by pits that were, up until the instant they attacked, gentle and affectionate. “We didn’t abuse him or train him to be mean. He’s never had a problem.” Famous last words. Any dog can be dangerous, and any dog can be unpredictable under the right circumstances, but pit bulls are a different case.
“Dog fighting has become more of an underground network, and is very illegal”
When fighting was outlawed, “dogmen” started focusing on dogfights exclusively since they’re a lot easier to hide than bullbaiting. They started adapting dogs for these fights, and this was the time when pit bulls were either developed or already existed under the name Pit and Bull Terrier: http://www.dogsbite.org/pdf/pit-bulls-gary-wilkes-spring-2010-off-lead.pdf Quote: “Over time, Bull Terriers and Staffordshire Bull Terriers faded from the dog fighting pits. The most logical assumption is that they simply couldn’t compete with their appropriately named cousin (p3).”
As for the therapy, bomb-sniffing aspect of pit bulls. The question here is not if they do this work, but if they should do this work. I’m firmly convinced pit bulls are too unpredictable and dangerous to be trusted. To me it seems like another opportunity to retool the image of the breed so people will become completely convinced they don’t have a bad reputation for a valid reason.
Dog Lover and Cat Hater November 2, 2013 at 1:12 am
You cannot respond with anything else, coz you’re an idiot.
dogsfromhell November 2, 2013 at 8:08 am
Dear Amy,
Please use your primary screen name AKA “AMY” when responding. Thanks
dogsfromhell November 2, 2013 at 8:35 am
Good information Tfa. Thanks!
The first anon November 2, 2013 at 5:17 pm
You’re welcome.
The first anon November 2, 2013 at 9:33 pm
I don’t believe German shepherds and Rottweilers have been more deadly than pit bulls. On the top ten, yes. But not above pit bulls. What span of years are your statistics from? German shepherds were the second most popular dog breed in 2012 and Rottweilers were ninth. Both have been on the top fifteen since at least 2002: http://www.akc.org/reg/dogreg_stats.cfm I didn’t see American pit bull terrier, but Staffordshire bull terriers are #76 and and American Staffordshire terriers are #79. It is not unreasonable, then, to imagine there are higher populations of German shepherds and Rottweilers than pit bulls.
Also, 60 pit bull deaths vs 10 St. Bernard deaths or even 18 Great Dane deaths are hardly a tad more.
Billy November 11, 2013 at 11:23 pm
Wrong. Wolves have been found killing young elk in surplus if they have the opportunity to do so, even when they’re not hungry. Do you honestly think they won’t rip a living fawn apart? Because they do. Wolves also dig into their prey regardless if they’re dead or alive, which includes elk fawns and other fawns in general. They’ve also been noted to rip coyotes apart alive for varying reasons. Hunting dogs have the instinct to kill things they way they do because they’re descended from wolves; the only reason you don’t see wolves killing massively on the same scale dogs are capable of is because they’re wild animals that do not have access to as much food and prey. If they did, they would act no different.
Cats kill hundreds of birds and small animals, and their owners see only a portion of the body count. They kill countless more than dogs and leave up to fifty percent of their body count to rot. Weasels have been noted to slaughter entire chicken coops and leave the corpses behind after taking only a few. There are countless cases of wild animals that will kill for fun; hell, sea otter males have been found raping baby seals, and dolphins are notorious for raping other dolphins, as well as killing for pleasure.
It’s fine if you hate dogs, because not everyone likes them, but you’re misinformed.
dogsfromhell November 12, 2013 at 6:16 am
Why does any of that make dogs better? Dogs live in our residential communities unlike these animals and they routinely attack and sometimes murder humans especially the vulnerable like children. If dogs had been left in the wild where they belong natural selection would have done its job and we would not have dog over population like today.
dogsfromhell November 12, 2013 at 9:28 pm
Why didnt the pitbull rescue the owner??? He must have forgotten to feed them before he died. Unconditional love bites the dust. HA!
Huffington Post:Pit Bull Eats Parts Of Man Who Was Apparently Overdosed On Drugs
First Posted: 06/16/11 12:21 PM ET Updated: 08/16/11 06:12 AM ET
Authorities are struggling to determine with certainty what killed Matthew Lebold, an apparent drug user who was also missing large portions of his face when his body was found.
Police were called to the 25-year-old Lebold’s home in the Lakeview neighborhood of Chicago on Tuesday afternoon for a well-being check. His father made the call after not hearing from him for some time, according to the Chicago Tribune.
He was found dead in the home, appearing to have overdosed on drugs — but also having suffered serious trauma to his upper body from his pit bull.
A source told the Chicago Sun-Times that the dog “had eaten through parts of the man’s face, neck and chest after he was dead.”
At first, it was unclear if the dog had killed Lebold, but after further analysis, investigators believe the wounds were inflicted postmortem.
The autopsy performed on Lebold Wednesday was inconclusive, but the Cook County Medical Examiner’s office is still waiting on results from a toxicology test, which will likely confirm that his death was drug-related.
The first anon December 13, 2013 at 7:02 pm
GOD I wish I were brave enough to put this on Facebook.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=648923875166375
Pit bull advocates, are you brave enough to watch?
dogsfromhell December 13, 2013 at 8:48 pm
Thank you for sharing this video. Sadly, about another child was murdered by a pit bull. Please support legislation to restrict bully breeds and keep our children safe.
dogsfromhell February 28, 2014 at 9:02 pm
Trending Now on Patch
Mom Wants Pitbulls Banned After Her Toddler is Mauled
Mom becomes activist for banning the breed in Georgia.
Posted by Tara May Tesimu , February 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM
Comment91368
A Georgia mother wants pit bulls banned.
Fulton County, Ga. — A woman whose son was mauled to death by a pit bull terrier wants Georgia lawmakers to ban the breed from the state.
WSB-TV reports Angela Rutledge began her campaign to ban pit bulls after her 2-year-old son was mauled to death by her family’s dog in April 2012. The Fulton County woman headed Tuesday to the steps of the state capitol in Atlanta.
Rutledge says she has concluded pit bulls are “an aggressive breed” that can pose a danger even to their owners.
She was being joined at the statehouse rally by Jeff Borchardt of Wisconsin, who founded the group Daxton’s Friends for Canine Education and Awareness after his 14-month-old son was killed by pit bulls, WSB-TV reported.
dogsfromhell February 28, 2014 at 9:15 pm
This happened in Newark NJ. Apparently the father believed the “Nanny Dog myth”. The boy’s father is being charged. No mention of the dogs being put down.
A 10-year-old city boy was home alone Wednesday when two pit bulls viciously attacked and critically injured him inside his Ironbound apartment, Newark Police said.
The boy was taken to University Hospital with life-threatening injuries following the attack on Hawkins Court at about 11:30 a.m. Wednesday, according to NJ.com.
A neighbor kicked in the apartment door when he heard the boy screaming as the dogs mauled and bit him, the article said. The boy suffered serious injuries to his face and neck, neighbors told NJ.com.
An officer needed to shoot both dogs, killing one of them, as the animals charged at police when they arrived.
The boy’s father, Enrique Carrillo, 41, was charged with endangering the welfare of a child, according to NJ.com.
http://newarknj.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/pit-bulls-maul-newark-boy-10-left-home-alone
dogsfromhell February 28, 2014 at 9:35 pm
http://blog.sfgate.com/cwnevius/2013/06/18/pit-bulls-maul-kid-but-there-are-never-consequences/#13348101=0
Pit bulls maul kid, but there are never consequences
Posted on June 18, 2013 | By C.W. Nevius
Nephi Selu died after being bitten by his family’s pit bull mix, Gava.
At this point everyone has their roles ready and their lines down pat.
When 6-year-old Nephi Selu was attacked, mauled and killed by a pit bull (or pit bull mix) in Union City, the pit bull critics and the defenders already had their scripts ready to go.
Most of us said what we always say when a pit bull mauls someone — that breed is dangerous. Dr. Alan Beck of Purdue University School of Veterinary Medicine put it well when I interviewed in 2005 after a “friendly” pit bull mauled an 88-year-old woman who had interacted with the dog without incident countless times.
“We are not surprised when a pointer starts pointing,” he said. “Or when my dachshund starts digging. Everyone expects that. But if we start talking about a low tolerance for pain and a propensity to attack, it’s wrong.”
But we know the defenders will soon be in full cry. It’s not the dog’s fault, they’ll say, it is the owner. The child should never have put himself in that position. There were other factors we don’t know about.
Someone once compared the pit bull apologists to the National Rifle Association. They have a prepared script, they are vociferous and they are tireless. They’d love to get into a debate with you because it goes on and on and on. They send three e-mails to your one. They have self-serving statistics from advocacy web sites that they can quote for hours.
But here’s the puzzler. They are also often incredibly, uncontrollably angry. All of us in the news business take on the pit bull issue from time to time and we all have stories of threats — “Someone needs to stop you,” was the most recent I got — and warnings. They scream, they insult, and they stoop to racist, offensive language.
But someone died.
A child in this case. An elderly woman in another. In San Francisco in 2005 a woman left her 12-year-old son, Nicholas Faibish, in the basement with two pit bulls. While the parents were away the dogs were put in a room with the door propped shut with a shovel.
When the mother returned her son had been mauled to death. It was, she insisted in an interview with me, a complete surprise.
“My kids got along great with (the dogs),” Maureen Faibish said. “We were never seeing any violent tendencies.”
It happens over and over and it seems there’s never any change or consequence. The city of Denver passed “breed specific legislation” in 1989, targeting pit bulls and dogs with “the major characteristics of one.”
Miami did the same that year, banning pit bulls, and it has held up. Last year a ballot initiative to repeal the ban lost by a resounding 63-36 percent.
Passing an ordinance like that in San Francisco would be hard. But more than that it would be unpleasant. Although the Miami vote indicates that the majority of ordinary citizens aren’t buying the happy chat about pit bulls, few want to take on the insults and anger of the fanatics.
So, apparently, we will stick with what we have — periodic maulings and death, followed by arguments that go nowhere.
And pit bulls roam the streets, wait in back yards and make headlines every time they maul or kill.
And when that happens, pit bull advocates always say the same thing: This was a complete surprise.
Mary Ann Redfern June 8, 2014 at 9:59 am
There were several different dogs that played Petey throughout the run of the show. One of them WAS, in fact, fed meat mixed with glass.
CatsAreCool June 12, 2014 at 7:19 pm
Funny thing is that I have a friend named Izzy who has a pit bull. 😛
Teresa Cox June 22, 2014 at 3:14 am
People like Death to Pitbulls have their hearts filled with hate and have no room for anything else..I guess they are all related to Hitler..
Teresa Cox June 22, 2014 at 3:15 am
another Hitler…feel so sorry for you
Teresa Cox June 22, 2014 at 3:17 am
you must be a serial killer in the making Izzy…
Teresa Cox June 22, 2014 at 3:24 am
You shouldn’t have taken them, they would be better off with someone that has a caring soul, not an ugly one like yours, snakelady.
Teresa Cox June 22, 2014 at 3:26 am
they ar not the ideal for everyone..whatever breed you want do yor research.
Teresa Cox June 22, 2014 at 3:33 am
I am a person that is a responsible dog owner and yes I have a pit bull. i learned about the breed and I am still learning and will be learning for the rest of my life. Many feel that it is just pit bull owners that are irresponsible but anyone can be regardless of whaat breed of dog they have. And some of you are so filled with hate there is no room in your heart for love or compassion and I truly feel sorry for you.
Teresa Cox June 22, 2014 at 3:38 am
doghater…I bet you just hate everything…just wonder what God would say to you and to all of the other dog haters and pit bull haters…..
dogsfromhell June 22, 2014 at 4:34 am
God would probably say, “What the hell is that creature? I don’t remember seeing it on Noah’s Ark. It looks, smells and acts like a Genetically Modified Organism.”
dogsfromhell June 22, 2014 at 4:41 am
I am a person that is a responsible dog owner and yes I have a pit bull.
That’s what they all say,in addition to:
“My dog never barks”
“Its how they were raised”
“It never showed signs of aggression”
“It never bit anyone before”
You can “learn” all your life but frankly it’s not that complicated. Dog cultists created a monster and now we’re all stuck with it. Good job. Don’t feel sorry for us. Feel sorry for the children and other vulnerable victim’s of pit bull attack.
dogsfromhell June 22, 2014 at 4:44 am
No research required. Pit bulls have earned the reputation they deserve.
dogsfromhell June 22, 2014 at 4:55 am
You make a lot of references to Hilter. Why the fixation? Your comments are hateful and aggressive. I have often wondered why certain individuals are so attracted to pit bulls. It is very likely the similar aggressive/violent behavioral traits. Check out willko’s explanation. You are a telling example.
Just a reminder to all the trolls on this site. Dog owners are responsible for the starving, neglecting, torturing, abuse and killing of dogs. The reason is simple. One must first own and hold captive a fur slave in order to do these things. Kind of like Hilter!
dogsfromhell June 22, 2014 at 5:06 am
Reality check: Pit Bulls are responsible for thousands of attacks, some fatal, every year. They maim, maul and kill children whose lives are forever changed. Do the RESEARCH. Denial cannot alter statistics.
Teresa Cox June 22, 2014 at 10:40 am
Reality check for you… Have you done research on the other end of the spectrum?/ Have you researched the many pit bull that have saved people…that are therapy dogs ; rescue dogs etc.. I think I am just wasting my time because nothing I say or prove to you will suffice. You just hate and that is just so very sad. Maybe one day you will be facing death and the one thing you hate the most will save your life…Then how will you feel about the breed at that point?
Teresa Cox June 22, 2014 at 10:47 am
Dogsfromhell; what has caused you to hate?/ Have you ever met a pit bull?? They were once the most beloved dog in the USA; Have you even tried to find out good things about them?
Teresa Cox June 22, 2014 at 10:49 am
People need to be responsible, whatever breed of dog they own. They are many that are not responsible, but there aremany that are.
Teresa Cox June 22, 2014 at 10:55 am
There are more people that kill humans than dogs and they should be removed from the community.. A When the kids were attacked, where were the parents??
dogsfromhell June 22, 2014 at 12:01 pm
There are never any excuses for a dog attacking a human, especially a child. A “pet” by definition is a domesticated animal that has adapted to living in a HUMAN environment. If dogs are to live in OUR human habitat, they need to be socialized not to attack humans. Aggressive dogs aka pit bulls clearly have not. To clarify: NO EXCUSES.
dogsfromhell June 22, 2014 at 12:12 pm
You’ve bought into the myth of the hero dog. Dogs have long outlived their usefulness. “Therapy dogs” are promoted by the dog obsessed. If a dog ever came near me in an alleged therapeutic setting I would be looking for my lawyer. I can’t imagine what value a filthy dog could possibly provide especially when there are well trained, educated HUMAN therapists. Peer support groups provide human contact and the support of other HUMANS. Why attempt to replace humans with another species? Technology and other HUMANS supersede the magical powers of dogs. On the few occasions where a dog is alleged to have rescued someone, most times it is just fantasy on the part of dog cultists.
dogsfromhell June 22, 2014 at 12:16 pm
I am glad to see you are finally catching on. Yep this is a dog haters site. Not sure why you feel compelled to visit. I suspect you have issues with boundaries as many cultists do. It is also why doggers like yourself are unclear regarding the boundaries between dogs and humans.
Teresa Cox June 23, 2014 at 10:59 am
Honestly I thought I would be reading the article; guess not. I am not here to bash anyone. I just have come to realize that you hate dogs and no matter what info given, you will now and forever hate dogs. So I will not visit here again.
dogsfromhell June 23, 2014 at 2:17 pm
We have come to realize that dog cultists will always impose their beasts on the general public, whether it is barking a block away, contributing to environmental pollution or violently attacking you. No matter what information you give to a dog cultist they still feel entitled to force their dogs on people and can’t understand why people hate dogs because of their own behavior. I hope the dog obsessed visit dog cultist sites.
Veronyka June 23, 2014 at 11:16 pm
I can write some facts to state my opinion but truth is you people just don’t get it so let me put it this way…. SHUT UP!!! Go find something better to do and complain about. I sure there’s something missing in your sour lives that you need to come on here and bash dogs or pittes in general. I own 3 and yes they are strong, hard headed, and strong willed so you have to raise it properly. Love and boundaries are key for these dogs. People kill, rape, kidnap kids and adults everyday and you’re wasting your time hating dogs???
Rethink your priorities.
dogsfromhell June 24, 2014 at 5:14 am
The FACTS are most dog violence is perpetuated by pit bulls. I hope you do not have children as we will most likely hear about them in the news. This is very sad. My observation of pit bull owners is that they are often hostile angry bullies very much like their beasts. In spite of this they somehow imagine they are victims and therefore have assigned victim-hood to their fur slaves as well. You can’t “love” an animal’s genes away. You have bought into pit bull mythology promoted by the pet industry and pit bull advocates. Do a little digging and you will learn most pit bull enthusiasts consider themselves victims and seek a mascot.
You make the common dog cultist mistake of equating dogs with humans. Human behavior is a separate issue. It has nothing to do with dogs living in OUR human environment. Pets are supposed to adapt to a human habitat. Pit bulls clearly have failed and do no belong in residential areas.
Lastly, I am curious why you feel compelled to visit out site. There are many dogger sites and pit bully sites too. I suspect you are seeking conflict. Very much like your demon dog. Consider your priorities. A strong suggestion would be cleaning up your dog’s environmental HAZMAT material aka shit for starters.
wendy January 20, 2015 at 12:19 pm
Well i had a pitbull never hurt anyone. But a friend of mine
Had a chiauiawai that sent someone to the hosital to get 75
Stitches in their face. Well. All dogs bite so. If you down one
Breed down them all.
dogsfromhell January 20, 2015 at 3:37 pm
Windy,
Everyone knows Chihuahuas are nasty vicious little bastards. That doesn’t invalidate the fact that pit bulls will maul or kill you. If a floor rat approached me I’d just kick it down the stairs. I have a long iron rod that I carry with me while outside. IF the neighborhood Chihuahua came at me, it would become a squirrel snack. So while all dogs can bite, they all don’t tear flesh, clamp down/shake infants like a rag doll, severe limbs, render children emotionally and physically scarred for life and routinely murder humans. The fact that a particular pit bull hasn’t aggressed is no guarantee that it won’t go psycho at some later date. That’s one of the problems with them. They don’t give warning signs that they are about to attack. Being in denial doesn’t change that fact. Lets also not forget that pit nutters have a long documented history of hiding any aggression to protect these demons. I personally know someone who drove 2 hours to take her pit beast on a “playdate” only to have the thing aggress on her during the course of the “play”. Rather than go to a local emergency room, she drove herself home, bleeding, with pit bull in tow and went to the hospital where she is employed as a nurse. Her agenda of course was to hid the attack and not report the incident to authorities. Sadly that thing will someday likely attack a child but I’ll bet money she swears it had “no history of aggression”. The entire pit culture is unethical, delusional and dangerous.
Trish June 18, 2015 at 9:20 am
My preacher owns three rescue pits, it’s not about looking tough it’s about love and caring for God’s creatures
Anynomous August 13, 2015 at 12:35 pm
“My preacher owns three rescue pits, it’s not about looking tough it’s about love and caring for God’s creatures”
Dogs are not God’s creatures. They are hybrid pieces of shit that eat shit. Therefore your logic is flawed and all dogs can be buried alive.
dogsfromhell August 14, 2015 at 9:53 pm
Does he feed his creature some of gods other creatures?
Anynomous August 18, 2015 at 9:59 am
hahahaha. It’s a dog eat dog world out there fromhell.
CatzRuleDogzDrool September 18, 2015 at 4:05 pm
Thank gawd I live in Ontario Canada where these ugly and vicious mutts are BANNED!!!!!!! There must be good reason for our government to have done this – Pit nutters need to wake up – those things are time bombs and should be irradiated from the face of the planet!!
E.F November 8, 2015 at 10:49 am
It’s funny really, how we ‘dog haters’ are trying to save the massive, deluded communities that currently infest this world with lies, telling us of how great these dangerous animals are by showing proof of their dangerous acts, proof of statistics showing how they pollute our environment, it is FACT that they are butt ugly creatures, it is FACT that they live based on instinct no matter if they are domesticated or not, thus they will attack any human for any unpredictable reason, and dog lovers will continue to blame humans, usually dog haters for their dogs behaviour, or they will down right just not admit to their dog being bad at all ‘despite the proof against that statement’…
We are trying very hard to save this world, but yet there are people like Veronyka, these dog lovers/owners/cultists etc. who come on here and support the idea of children’s faces getting mauled off, humans breathing in faecal matter-particles 24/7, ugly creatures bleeding us of money, true happiness, time and resources and yet they continue to call US monsters, or idiots or dog abusers…
Sure, there are some of us who wish the canine species to be erased entirely, but the honest truth of the matter is that it would only do our entire community, and planet a great deed, sure, it will upset some people, but a little “boohoo’ing” from people is a small price to pay for the global safety of Earth’s superior creatures *humans*.
We can continue to provide proof as to why dogs are ugly, stupid, pathetic, annoying, useless, upsetting, flea-ridden, unloving, greedy, attention-seeking, dangerous (and more) animals.
Yet these dog lovers continue to teach their children, and spread the news to others that all of this behaviour is something that should be supported by calling dogs ‘family’, kissing their grimy, germ-ridden mongrels, and having a go at the very people ‘us’ seeking to protect human-kind from the dumb beasts.
Lawgal74 November 11, 2015 at 7:58 am
I’ve been reading some of these posts & the reasoning makes zero sense to me bc many are listing that 30 or so people have been killed by dogs this year & they cannot understand why people put money into dogs, etc yet more people than that have been killed in the inner city near me in the last few months. I guess we should say all the inner city residents are dangerous & should be put down & no one should seven try to help them bc it’s in their genes to kill. lets actually do some research on the percentage of dogs that attack/kill versus the percentage of people who attack/kill. When percentage of dog kills exceeds human kills then I might start changing my mind about dogs being “dangerous”.
Lawgal74 November 11, 2015 at 8:30 am
To take my point further, the inner city area I’m speaking of is made up of a majority African Americans & Hispanic residents. So since they have had so many murders & attacks in this area, I guess we should say no one should ever adopt an African american or Hispanic child bc they are all predisposed to aggression. That would be just as stupid an argument as the argument pit bull haters are making. Look at the percentage of pit bulls in the country vs the amount of pit bull attacks/kills then look at the amount of people living in these high crime, minority based, inner city areas vs the amount of attacks/kills in those areas & you could come to the same conclusion or make the same argument for both. However, both arguments would be ignorant. Humans are the most dangerous animals on earth by far (regardless of race or location). I’m an attorney & would much rather give money to an animal shelter than to the welfare system bc animals can’t take care of themselves, people can. If a person legitimately can’t care for themselves/work, then they will qualify for disability. I would also rather give money to animal organizations who are working to preserve a species or the environment. Just as dog haters have lost faith in dogs, many animal lovers have lost faith in the majority of humanity.
dogsfromhell November 11, 2015 at 12:44 pm
Lawgal74,
Nope, lets compare/contrast things that are the same. Dogs are a species living in our human environment. Imagined parallels between dogs and humans make ” zero sense”. For a comparison of environmental hazards follow the link to see the data. Since this was published, incidence of dog attack has increased. Note that dog bite injury to children ranks second. Dog nutter “logic” is driven by emotion, not fact, so nutters routinely compare dogs to children/humans since they believe their elite pets qualify as ” family” aka humans. Its all the same kool-aid.
http://www.whyihatedogs.com/2014/03/more-dogworshippers-suggestions-taken/
Bottom line: Pets don’t kill humans. NO EXCUSES.
dogsfromhell November 11, 2015 at 1:36 pm
Lawgal74
To take my point further, the inner city area I’m speaking of is made up of a majority African Americans & Hispanic residents. So since they have had so many murders & attacks in this area, I guess we should say no one should ever adopt an African american or Hispanic child bc they are all predisposed to aggression
Humans that kill or aggress go to jail. Dogs have idiot lawyers from the Lexus Project and Sheriff Joe Joke saving them after they perp on children. Following your logic that African Americans and Hispanics are violent, as an attorney LMAO, you should know there are a disproportionate number of men of color residing within our military/industrial prison complex. For the record, I do not agree that people of color are violent nor should they overwhelmingly support prison entrepreneurs. But that’s another conversation.
Consult your local actuary with your home owners insurance policy, a FACT driven organization, to determine if your rates will drastically increase once they learn you are a pit owner. Insurance companies run from liability. Pit lobbyists couldn’t compensate insurance companies for the loses they would incur if they didn’t account for pit liability.
PS“I’m an attorney” HA! It would be a stretch if to say there was an advanced degree or even a college education behind your reasoning, writing or ‘rithmatic. More kool-aid?
mfatpony@aol.com November 11, 2015 at 3:55 pm
Ah. the humans and dogs apples and oranges argument. Not very original. I was hoping for some better entertainment.
DOMESTIC PETS DON’T KILL HUMANS !
mfatpony@aol.com November 12, 2015 at 11:45 am
Lawgal74
To take my point further, the inner city area I’m speaking of is made up of a majority African Americans & Hispanic residents. So since they have had so many murders & attacks in this area, I guess we should say no one should ever adopt an African american or Hispanic child bc they are all predisposed to aggression
————————————————————————–
By your own words you admit to their being a problem. It might also be worth pointing out to you that African Americans and Hispanics are not breeds of humans. Pits and their smarmy cousins were bred by humans for one thing. To fight. The truth is the common pit is not behaving in a violent manner for the breed. They are simply doing what their DNA has been plugged in to do. Environment and upbringing , training have been proven to accomplish zilch in relation to when and if a pit is going to decide that today is the day the baby gets chewed apart. On the flip side we know that poverty and lack of resources and absentee parents are the biggest issues in the neighborhoods you mention.
A simpler way to understand that pits are unable to control that impulse to grip, shake and shred would be comparing cats and birds.
I’ve had friends that had pet birds and cats for years. And one day the cat acts on it’s instincts to hunt the b bird usually with a very bad outcome for the bird. Most people can accept a herding dog herds but mention that a dog reconditioned from bull baiting to pit fighting might have a tendency to go postal you run into a headlock with the pit-a-holics Most dog breeds were created to fulfill a specific function. Those jaws were not developed to hold the baby. It is unacceptable for a domestic pet to attack humans totally unprovoked. Taking a bone, toy, being in a bouncy swing or any other nonsense or saying the dog was defending ITS yard when it killed a child need to be addressed in criminal court with the owners going to jail for a very long time.
dogsfromhell November 13, 2015 at 5:46 am
It might also be worth pointing out to you that African Americans and Hispanics are not breeds of humans.

mfp. I just can’t wrap my head around the logic of nutters thinking that people of color are like pits. Thanks for this excellent point.
mfatpony@aol.com November 13, 2015 at 11:37 am
Gee DFH going back and reading the troll post she seems awfully racist. Do we allow that here ?
dogsfromhell November 13, 2015 at 5:07 pm
Nope….not at all. We’ll have to flag her if she slithers back.

The “dog” Word in Different Languages – Dog God Not!

Dogs, Worldwide Known as The Diabolical Beasts The “dog” word obviously has different meanings in different languages. Sure, the d...

Popular Posts