None - Profits wasting valuable time, money and resources on dogs.
Written by Tim E. Roberts
Collaborating Author
 Yet 
organizations and 'none profits' - including 'RSPCA' in the UK have done
 virtually nothing to stop this terrible carnage. All they've often done
 is roll out more potentially deadly dangerous, environmentally 
destructive, unethically mutated dogs. the double standards of these 
supposed none profit groups is almost as sickening as that of the wider,
 harmful profit driven pet industry itself. These none profits have 
duped the public to get more money by pretending that all wildlife 
mattered to them.
Yet 
organizations and 'none profits' - including 'RSPCA' in the UK have done
 virtually nothing to stop this terrible carnage. All they've often done
 is roll out more potentially deadly dangerous, environmentally 
destructive, unethically mutated dogs. the double standards of these 
supposed none profit groups is almost as sickening as that of the wider,
 harmful profit driven pet industry itself. These none profits have 
duped the public to get more money by pretending that all wildlife 
mattered to them.
At the
 same time as allowing the destruction of our environment and genuine 
wildlife, these supposed non-profits have proliferated the dog, an 
environmentally harmful species. these none profits have encouraged the dog into our environment. a creature which is not only unnatural and 
unnecessary, but one which pollutes our environment with toxic waste and
 causes noise pollution. The dog, a mutated, invasive animal takes up 
much of these none profits time, money and resources meaning they have 
less energy to devote to helping genuine wildlife and environmental 
causes. The dog is badly adapted to life in the wilderness and to life 
around humans. I've generally found that the more a person is likely to 
keep pets, the less interest they tend to have in our environment as a 
whole. 
Another problem 
with keeping pets is, (and this applies to all pets) is in increasingly 
taking creatures out of the wild,  these species are more likely to 
become extinct. People think these creatures look 'cute' but they look 
the way they are because of evolution and natural selection over 
millions of years without human involvement. They've evolved without 
human interference and intervention. As soon as we begin to capture, 
tamper with and distort wild creatures, as we did with the dog, we 
create monsters. Some of the most hideous looking beasts I've ever seen 
have been dogs. some of them look as though they came out of a horror 
movie. Yet dog owners seem to think (do dog owners think?) that 
they're doing this for the benefit of the pooch. If animals genuinely 
mattered to dog owners and to humans in general we'd have left the 
canine species where it belong - in the distant wilderness. 
One another
 problem that isn't being addressed fully is how feral dogs could be 
interbreeding with genuinely wild, naturally selected wolves. This could
 be gradually causing the genuine wolfs' genetic line to be destroyed 
and could ultimately kill off the purity of the original, natural wolf 
species. The genuinely wild, natural wolf could become extinct as a 
result of this interbreeding and instead be replaced by an inferior 
hybrid or half-species. This pollution of the genuine wolf genome would 
ultimately be the fault of those misguided people who created dogs. 
So, what do you think? 
Related Articles:
How Many dogs Are Too Many?   When we 
consider:     - Number of people Killed by dogs every year - Babies, 
kids, adults, elderly.    ..
US and Worldwide Dog Ownership Statistics - 
2018/2019     Number of dogs in the United States 2018/2019  Here you 
can find the most curren...
Why Natural Animals Can Be Killed But Not 
Dogs? Hypocrisy?   Before you decide to shun this post, let me say that 
this article is *NOT* a... 


 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
All messages go through Moderation.
Dog lovers are NOT welcome. Thanks.